Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Emrys

(8,649 posts)
2. 12 years ago, the accounting error that led to the persistent fad for austerity measures and strict fiscal controls
Sun Jun 8, 2025, 11:41 PM
Jun 8

was widely acknowledged. But for some reason it caught the public imagination and has blighted our politics ever since:

The error that could subvert George Osborne's austerity programme

The theories on which the chancellor based his cuts policies have been shown to be based on an embarrassing mistake

It was a mistake in a spreadsheet that could have been easily overlooked: a few rows left out of an equation to average the values in a column.

The spreadsheet was used to draw the conclusion of an influential 2010 economics paper: that public debt of more than 90% of GDP slows down growth. This conclusion was later cited by the International Monetary Fund and the UK Treasury to justify programmes of austerity that have arguably led to riots, poverty and lost jobs.

Now the mistake in the spreadsheet has been uncovered – and the researchers who wrote the paper, Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff, have admitted it was wrong.

The correction is substantial: the paper said that countries with 90% debt ratios see their economies shrink by 0.1%. Instead, it should have found that they grow by 2.2% – less than those with lower debt ratios, but not a spiralling collapse. Yet cutting public spending to avoid that contraction has become a linchpin of both George Osborne's and the IMF's policies.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/apr/18/uncovered-error-george-osborne-austerity

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Will Bunn: Why George Osb...»Reply #2