Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wisconsin

ColinC

(11,098 posts)

4. Honestly only need to keep replacing until the ruling is finished

Reply to JohnSJ (Reply #2)

Thu Sep 7, 2023, 12:44 PM

Sep 2023

Also the time it takes to impeach is likely enough for the rulings to be made with no lore than two replacement judges.Then it wouldn’t matter what they do. She would only resign after she is impeached and can no longer rule on anything.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Republican Party's plan to rule the state of Wisconsin forever, explained [View all] Jilly_in_VA Sep 2023 OP

Um ColinC Sep 2023 #1

Wouldn't the republicans do the same thing with any replacement? JohnSJ Sep 2023 #2

Maybe not, if that replacement had been rather uncommunicative. raging moderate Sep 2023 #3

Honestly only need to keep replacing until the ruling is finished ColinC Sep 2023 #4

If they impeach the justice is suspended, and the repukes would prevent it from going to JohnSJ Sep 2023 #5

If they impeach she is suspended from hearing cases but she can still resign ColinC Sep 2023 #6

Wouldn't that only apply if she resigns before the impeachment? Regardless, if the justice resigns JohnSJ Sep 2023 #7

No, there is nothing keeping her from resigning after the impeachment ColinC Sep 2023 #8

As a Wisconsinite let free the dogs of war Jamke Sep 2023 #9