Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hay rick

(8,892 posts)
3. I hope things work out for the kids.
Thu May 31, 2012, 07:21 PM
May 2012

Still, I see them going from a secure situation to a more uncertain future and a situation in which their welfare largely depends on a job their mother does not yet have.

I know that part of your job is to make a plausible case for the competence of the mother. It sounds to me that there is a strong bias in the court system to keep the children with the birth mother rather than a foster parent. You said that "the court decided there was no evidence of abuse or harm by our client." Is that the primary standard used to decide these cases? That criterion strikes me as inferior to doing what is best for the children.

I hope that, in fact, this turns out to be best for the children.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Victory for whom? hay rick May 2012 #1
Our client was forced to take ANY employment in order to allow her the flexibility no_hypocrisy May 2012 #2
I hope things work out for the kids. hay rick May 2012 #3
It was beyond "plausible". It was compelling. no_hypocrisy Jun 2012 #4
Appreciate the expanded explanation. hay rick Jun 2012 #5
Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #6
UPDATE no_hypocrisy Sep 2012 #7
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New Jersey»This message was self-del...»Reply #3