Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

New Jersey

In reply to the discussion: NJ CD#5 - Scott Garrett [View all]
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
4. Sorry, I remembered the border issues wrong.
Wed Oct 9, 2013, 04:23 PM
Oct 2013

Rothman did move his residence, but, as you note, he chose to run in the district where his political base was. That's a reasonable choice.

I wasn't suggesting that Pascrell should have moved. The hard fact is that the redistricting created one district that included the political bases of two excellent liberal Democrats. My argument was that Pascrell, who was 75 at the time of the primary, should have stepped aside in favor of Rothman, who was 59. They were of equal seniority (both entered Congress in 1997), but Rothman would have more opportunity to build up and use additional seniority.

Yes, it's too bad that seniority is such a big deal in Congress. That's the way it is, though. We need progressives to move into more committee chairships (when the Dems are in the majority) and other important positions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NJ CD#5 - Scott Garrett [View all] ramapo Oct 2013 OP
No answers for you JustAnotherGen Oct 2013 #1
I don't blame Rothman. Jim Lane Oct 2013 #2
He moved to challenge Pascrell ramapo Oct 2013 #3
Sorry, I remembered the border issues wrong. Jim Lane Oct 2013 #4
Really a Democratic screwup ramapo Oct 2013 #5
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New Jersey»NJ CD#5 - Scott Garrett»Reply #4