Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

California

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)

4. Most legal-oriented minds...

Reply to quaint (Reply #3)

Mon Apr 10, 2023, 12:16 PM

Apr 2023

...have a hard time criminalizing the production of fictitious artwork without running into First Amendment problems.

The result is that some sort of additional behavior would be needed beyond simply making artwork depicting people without their consent.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

California could criminalize AI-generated revenge porn [View all] quaint Apr 2023 OP

Will that apply to all media? Effete Snob Apr 2023 #1

Legal-oriented minds will need to sort it; I'm too busy giggling at the er, statue. quaint Apr 2023 #3

Most legal-oriented minds... Effete Snob Apr 2023 #4

Well, the dictionary definition of pornography has an intent component... RockRaven Apr 2023 #6

Is revenge porn "intented to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings"? Effete Snob Apr 2023 #8

That analysis ignores the audience or conflates the audience with the subject. RockRaven Apr 2023 #9

? Effete Snob Apr 2023 #10

Intent of the producer/distributor for it to be erotic in the eyes of the recipients/audience. RockRaven Apr 2023 #11

Do it, but make the punishment five years in prison or $10,000. Auggie Apr 2023 #2

Once you've criminalized revenge porn, adding the AI aspect is just closing a loophole, frankly. RockRaven Apr 2023 #5

This ↑ quaint Apr 2023 #7