Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reACTIONary

(6,712 posts)
8. Well, playing the devil's advocate, this excerpt from the article....
Wed Sep 17, 2025, 10:58 PM
Wednesday

.... would maybe be the authors answer:

The arguments for a shutdown vary: to bring attention to the abuses of power of Trump; to wring policy concessions, particularly on health care; to demand an end to impoundment and rescission and other deal breaking; to push Trump back toward constitutional governance; to pick a fight because Democrats need a fight, and it would help party unity. Are they all wrongheaded?

Generally, they are all misguided, and none of them are likely to work. But I also think you can rank them. The worst idea is to shut down the government over general Trump abuses or lawlessness. That will probably never work at a policy level — how could it?— and would tend to unify the G.O.P. while Democrats bickered over the strategy and eventually split over whether to continue the shutdown. The public will likely be confused about what the Democrats are even demanding.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Should Democrats be willi...»Reply #8