Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(128,749 posts)
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 02:44 PM Aug 5

Gabbard's intel trove disproves her Obama 'treason' claim [View all]

By Martin Schram / Tribune News Service

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s release of once-secret work documents has produced new clarity on what U.S. intel elites decided Russia did and didn’t do to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

She deserves our gratitude. Thanks to Gabbard’s decision to disclose a number of carefully redacted but readable work documents, Americans who were still confused can finally understand what really happened – and clearly didn’t happen – in that election in which both political parties seemed to end up communicating with us via towers of babble.

Most importantly, those of you who are still-doubting voters can read for yourselves the documents that will convince you about whether President Donald Trump’s director of national intelligence correctly claimed, just the other day, that former President Barack Obama and his team committed a “treasonous conspiracy” against Trump and the American people in the 2016 election.

2016? Why are we still talking about that? Well, so you won’t be talking about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. So Gabbard came to the White House briefing room to tell you about it the other day. She and her boss and all who speak in the name of Team Trump are justifying it by carefully conflating two totally different types of potential election interference; hoping to get you all confused.

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/comment-gabbards-intel-trove-disproves-her-obama-treason-claim/

They're going to try and rehash John Durham's unsuccessful investigation. That dead horse is pulp by now.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Gabbard's intel trove dis...