Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

question everything

(50,677 posts)
Tue Apr 15, 2025, 10:44 PM Apr 2025

Trump, Abrego Garcia and the Courts - WSJ Editorial [View all]

Does President Trump want to force a showdown at the Supreme Court over executive power and the judiciary? That’s the way it looks from the way the Administration is handling the case of deportee Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia. Last week the Court tried to split the baby in a standoff between a federal judge and the Justice Department over the El Salvadoran who was deported with some 200 gang members. Judge Paula Xinis had instructed the White House to “facilitate” Mr. Abrego Garcia’s return, and the Supreme Court agreed.

(snip)

Invitation not taken. The judge on Friday demanded an immediate Administration report, and now the White House seems to have decided it can do a legal dance to claim it doesn’t need to facilitate anything. That was clear from the Kabuki theater Monday when Mr. Trump appeared in the Oval Office with El Salvador President Nayib Bukele. Asked if he could return Mr. Abrego Garcia, Mr. Bukele said, “How can I return him to the United States? . . . I smuggle him into the United States or what do I do? . . . The question is preposterous.”

Mr. Trump sat there smiling as if he knew he’d been handed a way to duck the command of the federal courts. Attorney General Pam Bondi said the Administration understands Judge Xinis’s instruction to “facilitate” to mean merely that “if El Salvador wants to return him . . . we would facilitate it, meaning provide a plane.”

(snip)

The larger problem is that Mr. Abrego Garcia was deported without due process. The Administration first said he was sent to the Salvadorean mega prison because of an “administrative error,” but it has since suspended the staff attorney who made that court filing. Mr. Abrego Garcia “was not mistakenly sent to El Salvador. He is an illegal alien from El Salvador,” White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told Fox News. “In 2019 he was ordered deported. He [has] a final removal order from the United States. These are things that no one disputes. Where is he from? El Salvador. Where is he a resident and citizen of? El Salvador. Is he here illegally? Yes. Does he have a deportation order? Yes.”

(snip)

Mr. Trump would be wise to settle all of this by quietly asking Mr. Bukele to return Mr. Abrego Garcia, who has a family in the U.S. But the President may be bloody-minded enough that he wants to show the judiciary who’s boss. If this case does become a judicial showdown, Mr. Trump may assert his Article II powers not to return Mr. Abrego Garcia, and the Supreme Court will be reluctant to disagree. But Mr. Trump would be smarter to play the long game. He has many, much bigger issues than the fate of one man that will come before the Supreme Court. By taunting the judiciary in this manner he is inviting a rebuke on cases that carry far greater stakes.

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/donald-trump-abrego-garcia-deportation-el-salvador-nayib-bukele-supreme-court-5b3464f4?st=216qsa&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

free

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kick question everything Apr 2025 #1
Bondi does not have any admissible evidence to support her lies LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2025 #2
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Trump, Abrego Garcia and ...