Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

ancianita

(40,369 posts)

7. I see. The Atlantic isn't writing specifically for Musk. It's our 2nd oldest magazine with a much broader audience.

Reply to LearnedHand (Reply #6)

Thu Feb 6, 2025, 10:00 PM

Feb 6

It's got long term memory and good old American common sense, and a liberal bias (70% of the time, anyway).
It doesn't identify itself as 'advocacy journalism' like, arguably, The Rolling Stone or The New Republic.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Again. Who's got the nuclear codes? [View all] ancianita Feb 6 OP

By now the codes are probably all over the place. Think. Again. Feb 6 #1

Here's Who Has the "Nuclear Football" MrWowWow Feb 6 #2

Cute. Thanks, good parrot, ChatGPT! ancianita Feb 6 #4

JFC why the "advisory" tone of this piece LearnedHand Feb 6 #3

So what tone would you prefer -- critical tone? explanatory tone? panic tone? informational tone? ancianita Feb 6 #5

I'm referring to how The Atlantic seemed to be moving toward being the opposition LearnedHand Feb 6 #6

I see. The Atlantic isn't writing specifically for Musk. It's our 2nd oldest magazine with a much broader audience. ancianita Feb 6 #7