Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

stopdiggin

(14,742 posts)

22. you do you. Meanwhile, I am going to criticize Democrats when they make egregious ethical

Reply to SunSeeker (Reply #20)

Wed Nov 19, 2025, 05:06 PM

19 hrs ago

pratfalls. This was an egregious ethical blunder.
You do not 'coordinate' with convicted felons while in the midst of official hearings and testimony.
The very concept is sleazy and revolting. Democrat or no !

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ForgoTheConsequence

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

House Republicans move to censure Plaskett over text messages with Epstein [View all] Zorro Tuesday OP

If only Republicans were as eager to pursue Epstein's predator friends dlk Tuesday #1

i agree with norman in general, but rampartd Tuesday #2

Epstein had been convicted as a sex offender of minors eleven years earlier MichMan Tuesday #3

i get it, but if court decisions are the standard. rampartd Tuesday #4

Have no idea of what that has anything to do with Plaskett and Epstein texting each other in a congressional hearing MichMan Tuesday #5

I hadn't heard about any of this before now, slightlv Tuesday #8

Here is a clip from the Washington Post of some of it MichMan Tuesday #10

Thank you... slightlv 19 hrs ago #26

Epstein was acting as an informant to Plaskett on Trump/Cohen for that 2019 hearing. SunSeeker Yesterday #13

having a hard time following the defense here stopdiggin Tuesday #9

Oops. Well that kinda' sucks. Well, okay - really, really blows? stopdiggin Tuesday #6

Plaskett did nothing wrong. She was using Epstein as an informant. SunSeeker Yesterday #14

believe that if you want to stopdiggin Yesterday #19

Yes, during the hearing, so she could get info on what Cohen was talking about. SunSeeker 22 hrs ago #20

you do you. Meanwhile, I am going to criticize Democrats when they make egregious ethical stopdiggin 19 hrs ago #22

There was nothing unethical about Plaskett getting info to prosecute Trump from his former best friend. SunSeeker 19 hrs ago #23

Disagree on the very strongest of terms stopdiggin 19 hrs ago #24

You've made your opinion quite clear. I, and House Democrats, do not share it. SunSeeker 19 hrs ago #25

Enough already RedArkGuy 15 hrs ago #28

Don't be absurd. I advocate no such thing. stopdiggin 14 hrs ago #29

I support censuring her. You cannot be appearing to take Wiz Imp Tuesday #7

I don't. She was not taking direction from Epstein, she was using him as an informant. SunSeeker Yesterday #15

I'd also add that whistleblowers . . . RedArkGuy 15 hrs ago #27

Wasn't She One of the Impeachment Managers? Deep State Witch Tuesday #11

Yes she was. But this is NOT payback Wiz Imp Yesterday #16

It totally was payback for her prosecution of Trump. SunSeeker 22 hrs ago #21

The motion FAILED. Plaskett did nothing wrong; she was talking to an scumbag informant to get info on Trump/Cohen. SunSeeker Tuesday #12

Who knew more about Trump and his dirty dealings that Jeffrey Epstein? mackdaddy Yesterday #17

Rep. Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina), is this lap puppy republianmushroom Yesterday #18

Gosh I wonder what sets her apart in their minds mahina 13 hrs ago #30