Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

stopdiggin

(14,739 posts)

19. believe that if you want to

Reply to SunSeeker (Reply #14)

Wed Nov 19, 2025, 12:43 PM

5 hrs ago

- 'informant' - ...................... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

to my eyes (and nose) - and I'd hazard to 98% of everyone else hearing this of this rather shocking 'exchange of information' - it stinks to high heaven! And, if she is my representative - she's going to be getting a hot load of 'opinion' in that regard from this direction!

Let us repeat - DURING the congressional hearing itself !!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

House Republicans move to censure Plaskett over text messages with Epstein [View all] Zorro 20 hrs ago OP

If only Republicans were as eager to pursue Epstein's predator friends dlk 20 hrs ago #1

i agree with norman in general, but rampartd 20 hrs ago #2

Epstein had been convicted as a sex offender of minors eleven years earlier MichMan 19 hrs ago #3

i get it, but if court decisions are the standard. rampartd 19 hrs ago #4

Have no idea of what that has anything to do with Plaskett and Epstein texting each other in a congressional hearing MichMan 19 hrs ago #5

I hadn't heard about any of this before now, slightlv 19 hrs ago #8

Here is a clip from the Washington Post of some of it MichMan 19 hrs ago #10

Thank you... slightlv 52 min ago #26

Epstein was acting as an informant to Plaskett on Trump/Cohen for that 2019 hearing. SunSeeker 17 hrs ago #13

having a hard time following the defense here stopdiggin 19 hrs ago #9

Oops. Well that kinda' sucks. Well, okay - really, really blows? stopdiggin 19 hrs ago #6

Plaskett did nothing wrong. She was using Epstein as an informant. SunSeeker 14 hrs ago #14

believe that if you want to stopdiggin 5 hrs ago #19

Yes, during the hearing, so she could get info on what Cohen was talking about. SunSeeker 4 hrs ago #20

you do you. Meanwhile, I am going to criticize Democrats when they make egregious ethical stopdiggin 1 hr ago #22

There was nothing unethical about Plaskett getting info to prosecute Trump from his former best friend. SunSeeker 1 hr ago #23

Disagree on the very strongest of terms stopdiggin 1 hr ago #24

You've made your opinion quite clear. I, and House Democrats, do not share it. SunSeeker 59 min ago #25

I support censuring her. You cannot be appearing to take Wiz Imp 19 hrs ago #7

I don't. She was not taking direction from Epstein, she was using him as an informant. SunSeeker 14 hrs ago #15

Wasn't She One of the Impeachment Managers? Deep State Witch 19 hrs ago #11

Yes she was. But this is NOT payback Wiz Imp 9 hrs ago #16

It totally was payback for her prosecution of Trump. SunSeeker 3 hrs ago #21

The motion FAILED. Plaskett did nothing wrong; she was talking to an scumbag informant to get info on Trump/Cohen. SunSeeker 18 hrs ago #12

Who knew more about Trump and his dirty dealings that Jeffrey Epstein? mackdaddy 8 hrs ago #17

Rep. Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina), is this lap puppy republianmushroom 7 hrs ago #18