Latest Breaking News

Aussie105

(7,426 posts)

65. I'm not getting my hopes up.

Wed Nov 19, 2025, 12:54 AM

Yesterday

There will be redactions, phantom edits, and files that 'accidentally' fell into a shredder long ago.
(Trickery to protect the innocent, you know, important people like Trump.)

There has been enough time for some sanitation to have happened.

I'm guessing getting to see unmolested flight logs to Epstein's Island of Illicit Pleasure is too much to ask?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

House overwhelmingly passes bill to release Jeffrey Epstein files [View all] BumRushDaShow Tuesday OP

Almost unanimous... 427-1, 5 abstaining. ancianita Tuesday #1

No shit?! RussBLib Tuesday #2

No shit! Here's the link. ancianita Tuesday #5

Well Trump told them is was okay to vote for release. hadEnuf Tuesday #10

They'll try it and maybe get away with it for a while. But there are ways to read through redactions. ancianita Tuesday #21

Sadly, my thoughts too hibbing Tuesday #45

They have the most to lose, and with women were the biggest voting demographic on Nov 4. ancianita Tuesday #55

The fact that Trump and the GOP have fought this release hadEnuf Tuesday #56

I don't think this is going to matter much. My comment from another thread: InstantGratification Tuesday #27

I believe you. ancianita Tuesday #42

The pedophile party really had no choice. It was going to be passed by the Democrats and self preservation LiberalArkie Tuesday #15

Not one Republican can go back to their states & get re-elected after voting no. That's why they know they had no choice ancianita Tuesday #22

Eggxactly LiberalArkie Tuesday #24

It's got to get pass the Senate & Trump NotHardly Tuesday #28

Never happen as long as Dump is in office HighFired49 Tuesday #49

Hell popsdenver Tuesday #54

The Guardians Of Pedophiles can't install anyone other than the 2nd in line. Justice matters. Tuesday #61

Probably...... popsdenver Tuesday #63

Now on to the new excuses Fullduplexxx Tuesday #3

The 1? Clay Higgins, of course. Bo Zarts Tuesday #4

He said he voted no because he is worried about the "innocent people" named in the files. SunSeeker Tuesday #11

What about the innocent girls who were harmed? TexasBushwhacker Tuesday #60

He doesn't give a shit about them. nt SunSeeker Tuesday #62

His reasoning included a reference to "a rabid media" --: DeeDeeNY Tuesday #13

Either on the list durablend Tuesday #18

If you read his Wikipedia you will vanlassie Tuesday #38

Make no mistake, almost all of the Republicans (the 4 who signed the discharge petition excepted) Wiz Imp Tuesday #6

Agree but Trump did tell them to vote for it... also Johnson is trying to create a provision to exempt perpetrators... chowder66 Tuesday #8

ABOUT TIME ! republianmushroom Tuesday #7

Wow! This tide has turned FakeNoose Tuesday #9

Brave warriors who have survived some of the most horrific crimes . LEMAUS Tuesday #16

Please quakerboy Tuesday #20

The Repukes who voted "yes" are under the impression that the Senate vote will be "no" FakeNoose Tuesday #46

Were they? quakerboy Yesterday #68

Nice! Photos are good optics that stick in voters' memories. ancianita Tuesday #25

Ahhh, but he will do something. That is what this BS investigation into Clinton et al is about. Bev54 Tuesday #26

Sorry, you first HighFired49 Tuesday #51

Not a problem all voices deserve to be heard. Bev54 Tuesday #57

There is a petition on Change.org Linda ladeewolf Tuesday #34

Finally some good news. LEMAUS Tuesday #12

They have been samplegirl Tuesday #14

who are the 5 that did not vote? nt orleans Tuesday #17

All Republicans. Just can't find their names yet, nor will, most likely for suspicious reasons. ancianita Tuesday #29

Here is the Roll Call vote - Not Voting were 3 (D)s and 2 (R)s BumRushDaShow Tuesday #41

Thank you! Now we can ask them why. ancianita Tuesday #44

Well Mikie Sherrill is now governor-elect of NJ BumRushDaShow Tuesday #50

Ah, thanks, I didn't catch that, being used to two of a number of names... ancianita Tuesday #52

3 dems, 2 Rs orleans Yesterday #64

right ancianita Yesterday #66

Just found this article BumRushDaShow Yesterday #67

When will anything new actually be released? Will Trump block all the way to the Supreme court? ChicagoTeamster Tuesday #19

Louisiana Republican Clay Higgins voted against the bill. Two Republicans and three Democrats did not vote. IronLionZion Tuesday #23

That's the question about those who abstained. Right? When their names are known they'll have some 'splainin' to do. ancianita Tuesday #31

No but he appears on Fox News regularly. Initech Tuesday #32

That 1 no vote is sticking out like a sore thumb! Initech Tuesday #30

He's probably in the files. nt iemanja Tuesday #36

He's probably in a safe district FakeNoose Tuesday #48

100% he did this to get airtime on Fox and Newsmax and boost his profile. Initech Tuesday #58

Up next: the Senate does everything in its power to prevent this from coming up for a vote Warpy Tuesday #33

Don't get too excited iemanja Tuesday #35

Full stop UT_democrat Tuesday #37

This is not normal. awesomerwb1 Tuesday #39

Now that their Fearful Leader has allowed it, the maggots come out of the woodwork to vote for it. Wonder Why Tuesday #40

What menace does orange have up his sleeve? Clouds Passing Tuesday #43

Epstein's brother is claiming that they are "scrubbing the files." Certainly months to do so. Evolve Dammit Tuesday #47

Excuse me, Clay Higgins C_U_L8R Tuesday #53

Too lopsided. Something's fishy SpankMe Tuesday #59

I'm not getting my hopes up. Aussie105 Yesterday #65