Latest Breaking News

SunSeeker

(57,304 posts)

12. The motion FAILED. Plaskett did nothing wrong; she was talking to an scumbag informant to get info on Trump/Cohen.

Tue Nov 18, 2025, 11:59 PM

Tuesday

Last edited Wed Nov 19, 2025, 12:43 AM - Edit history (2)

Unfortunately, that's what you must do to get info on Trump. Trump surrounds him with scumbags. She got info from Epstein, who happens to be her constituent since he resided in the Virgin Islands, to better question Cohen. Here's a sample exchange:

“Cohen brought up RONA - keeper of the secrets,” Epstein texted Plaskett at 2:24 p.m., misspelling the first name of former Trump executive assistant Rhona Graff, whom Cohen had mentioned in his testimony.

“RONA??” Plaskett responded. “Quick I’m up next is that an acronym,” she added.

“Thats his assistant,” Epstein replied, two minutes before Plaskett began asking Cohen questions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/11/18/plaskett-epstein-censure/

Pretty disappointing to see the piling on of Plaskett in this thread.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hugin Gymbo Chemical Bill Cha

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

House Republicans move to censure Plaskett over text messages with Epstein [View all] Zorro Tuesday OP

If only Republicans were as eager to pursue Epstein's predator friends dlk Tuesday #1

i agree with norman in general, but rampartd Tuesday #2

Epstein had been convicted as a sex offender of minors eleven years earlier MichMan Tuesday #3

i get it, but if court decisions are the standard. rampartd Tuesday #4

Have no idea of what that has anything to do with Plaskett and Epstein texting each other in a congressional hearing MichMan Tuesday #5

I hadn't heard about any of this before now, slightlv Tuesday #8

Here is a clip from the Washington Post of some of it MichMan Tuesday #10

Thank you... slightlv 12 hrs ago #26

Epstein was acting as an informant to Plaskett on Trump/Cohen for that 2019 hearing. SunSeeker Yesterday #13

having a hard time following the defense here stopdiggin Tuesday #9

Oops. Well that kinda' sucks. Well, okay - really, really blows? stopdiggin Tuesday #6

Plaskett did nothing wrong. She was using Epstein as an informant. SunSeeker Yesterday #14

believe that if you want to stopdiggin 16 hrs ago #19

Yes, during the hearing, so she could get info on what Cohen was talking about. SunSeeker 15 hrs ago #20

you do you. Meanwhile, I am going to criticize Democrats when they make egregious ethical stopdiggin 12 hrs ago #22

There was nothing unethical about Plaskett getting info to prosecute Trump from his former best friend. SunSeeker 12 hrs ago #23

Disagree on the very strongest of terms stopdiggin 12 hrs ago #24

You've made your opinion quite clear. I, and House Democrats, do not share it. SunSeeker 12 hrs ago #25

Enough already RedArkGuy 8 hrs ago #28

Don't be absurd. I advocate no such thing. stopdiggin 7 hrs ago #29

I support censuring her. You cannot be appearing to take Wiz Imp Tuesday #7

I don't. She was not taking direction from Epstein, she was using him as an informant. SunSeeker Yesterday #15

I'd also add that whistleblowers . . . RedArkGuy 8 hrs ago #27

Wasn't She One of the Impeachment Managers? Deep State Witch Tuesday #11

Yes she was. But this is NOT payback Wiz Imp 20 hrs ago #16

It totally was payback for her prosecution of Trump. SunSeeker 15 hrs ago #21

The motion FAILED. Plaskett did nothing wrong; she was talking to an scumbag informant to get info on Trump/Cohen. SunSeeker Tuesday #12

Who knew more about Trump and his dirty dealings that Jeffrey Epstein? mackdaddy 19 hrs ago #17

Rep. Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina), is this lap puppy republianmushroom 18 hrs ago #18

Gosh I wonder what sets her apart in their minds mahina 6 hrs ago #30