Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Deep State Witch

(12,463 posts)
11. Wasn't She One of the Impeachment Managers?
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 11:23 PM
Tuesday

Rep. Plaskett was one of the managers for TACO's second impeachment. This sounds like payback to me.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If only Republicans were as eager to pursue Epstein's predator friends dlk Tuesday #1
i agree with norman in general, but rampartd Tuesday #2
Epstein had been convicted as a sex offender of minors eleven years earlier MichMan Tuesday #3
i get it, but if court decisions are the standard. rampartd Tuesday #4
Have no idea of what that has anything to do with Plaskett and Epstein texting each other in a congressional hearing MichMan Tuesday #5
I hadn't heard about any of this before now, slightlv Tuesday #8
Here is a clip from the Washington Post of some of it MichMan Tuesday #10
Thank you... slightlv 14 hrs ago #26
Epstein was acting as an informant to Plaskett on Trump/Cohen for that 2019 hearing. SunSeeker Yesterday #13
having a hard time following the defense here stopdiggin Tuesday #9
Oops. Well that kinda' sucks. Well, okay - really, really blows? stopdiggin Tuesday #6
Plaskett did nothing wrong. She was using Epstein as an informant. SunSeeker Yesterday #14
believe that if you want to stopdiggin 19 hrs ago #19
Yes, during the hearing, so she could get info on what Cohen was talking about. SunSeeker 17 hrs ago #20
you do you. Meanwhile, I am going to criticize Democrats when they make egregious ethical stopdiggin 14 hrs ago #22
There was nothing unethical about Plaskett getting info to prosecute Trump from his former best friend. SunSeeker 14 hrs ago #23
Disagree on the very strongest of terms stopdiggin 14 hrs ago #24
You've made your opinion quite clear. I, and House Democrats, do not share it. SunSeeker 14 hrs ago #25
Enough already RedArkGuy 10 hrs ago #28
Don't be absurd. I advocate no such thing. stopdiggin 9 hrs ago #29
I support censuring her. You cannot be appearing to take Wiz Imp Tuesday #7
I don't. She was not taking direction from Epstein, she was using him as an informant. SunSeeker Yesterday #15
I'd also add that whistleblowers . . . RedArkGuy 10 hrs ago #27
Wasn't She One of the Impeachment Managers? Deep State Witch Tuesday #11
Yes she was. But this is NOT payback Wiz Imp 22 hrs ago #16
It totally was payback for her prosecution of Trump. SunSeeker 17 hrs ago #21
The motion FAILED. Plaskett did nothing wrong; she was talking to an scumbag informant to get info on Trump/Cohen. SunSeeker Tuesday #12
Who knew more about Trump and his dirty dealings that Jeffrey Epstein? mackdaddy 21 hrs ago #17
Rep. Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina), is this lap puppy republianmushroom 20 hrs ago #18
Gosh I wonder what sets her apart in their minds mahina 8 hrs ago #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Republicans move to...»Reply #11