Latest Breaking News

Bev54

(13,053 posts)

57. Not a problem all voices deserve to be heard.

Reply to HighFired49 (Reply #51)

Tue Nov 18, 2025, 07:12 PM

10 hrs ago

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

House overwhelmingly passes bill to release Jeffrey Epstein files [View all] BumRushDaShow 15 hrs ago OP

Almost unanimous... 427-1, 5 abstaining. ancianita 15 hrs ago #1

No shit?! RussBLib 15 hrs ago #2

No shit! Here's the link. ancianita 15 hrs ago #5

Well Trump told them is was okay to vote for release. hadEnuf 14 hrs ago #10

They'll try it and maybe get away with it for a while. But there are ways to read through redactions. ancianita 14 hrs ago #21

Sadly, my thoughts too hibbing 12 hrs ago #45

They have the most to lose, and with women were the biggest voting demographic on Nov 4. ancianita 12 hrs ago #55

The fact that Trump and the GOP have fought this release hadEnuf 11 hrs ago #56

I don't think this is going to matter much. My comment from another thread: InstantGratification 13 hrs ago #27

I believe you. ancianita 13 hrs ago #42

The pedophile party really had no choice. It was going to be passed by the Democrats and self preservation LiberalArkie 14 hrs ago #15

Not one Republican can go back to their states & get re-elected after voting no. That's why they know they had no choice ancianita 14 hrs ago #22

Eggxactly LiberalArkie 14 hrs ago #24

It's got to get pass the Senate & Trump NotHardly 13 hrs ago #28

Never happen as long as Dump is in office HighFired49 12 hrs ago #49

Hell popsdenver 12 hrs ago #54

The Guardians Of Pedophiles can't install anyone other than the 2nd in line. Justice matters. 9 hrs ago #61

Probably...... popsdenver 6 hrs ago #63

Now on to the new excuses Fullduplexxx 15 hrs ago #3

The 1? Clay Higgins, of course. Bo Zarts 15 hrs ago #4

He said he voted no because he is worried about the "innocent people" named in the files. SunSeeker 14 hrs ago #11

What about the innocent girls who were harmed? TexasBushwhacker 10 hrs ago #60

He doesn't give a shit about them. nt SunSeeker 9 hrs ago #62

His reasoning included a reference to "a rabid media" --: DeeDeeNY 14 hrs ago #13

Either on the list durablend 14 hrs ago #18

If you read his Wikipedia you will vanlassie 13 hrs ago #38

Make no mistake, almost all of the Republicans (the 4 who signed the discharge petition excepted) Wiz Imp 15 hrs ago #6

Agree but Trump did tell them to vote for it... also Johnson is trying to create a provision to exempt perpetrators... chowder66 14 hrs ago #8

ABOUT TIME ! republianmushroom 14 hrs ago #7

Wow! This tide has turned FakeNoose 14 hrs ago #9

Brave warriors who have survived some of the most horrific crimes . LEMAUS 14 hrs ago #16

Please quakerboy 14 hrs ago #20

The Repukes who voted "yes" are under the impression that the Senate vote will be "no" FakeNoose 12 hrs ago #46

Nice! Photos are good optics that stick in voters' memories. ancianita 13 hrs ago #25

Ahhh, but he will do something. That is what this BS investigation into Clinton et al is about. Bev54 13 hrs ago #26

Sorry, you first HighFired49 12 hrs ago #51

Not a problem all voices deserve to be heard. Bev54 10 hrs ago #57

There is a petition on Change.org Linda ladeewolf 13 hrs ago #34

Finally some good news. LEMAUS 14 hrs ago #12

They have been samplegirl 14 hrs ago #14

who are the 5 that did not vote? nt orleans 14 hrs ago #17

All Republicans. Just can't find their names yet, nor will, most likely for suspicious reasons. ancianita 13 hrs ago #29

Here is the Roll Call vote - Not Voting were 3 (D)s and 2 (R)s BumRushDaShow 13 hrs ago #41

Thank you! Now we can ask them why. ancianita 13 hrs ago #44

Well Mikie Sherrill is now governor-elect of NJ BumRushDaShow 12 hrs ago #50

Ah, thanks, I didn't catch that, being used to two of a number of names... ancianita 12 hrs ago #52

3 dems, 2 Rs orleans 5 hrs ago #64

right ancianita 2 hrs ago #66

Just found this article BumRushDaShow 1 hr ago #67

When will anything new actually be released? Will Trump block all the way to the Supreme court? ChicagoTeamster 14 hrs ago #19

Louisiana Republican Clay Higgins voted against the bill. Two Republicans and three Democrats did not vote. IronLionZion 14 hrs ago #23

That's the question about those who abstained. Right? When their names are known they'll have some 'splainin' to do. ancianita 13 hrs ago #31

No but he appears on Fox News regularly. Initech 13 hrs ago #32

That 1 no vote is sticking out like a sore thumb! Initech 13 hrs ago #30

He's probably in the files. nt iemanja 13 hrs ago #36

He's probably in a safe district FakeNoose 12 hrs ago #48

100% he did this to get airtime on Fox and Newsmax and boost his profile. Initech 10 hrs ago #58

Up next: the Senate does everything in its power to prevent this from coming up for a vote Warpy 13 hrs ago #33

Don't get too excited iemanja 13 hrs ago #35

Full stop UT_democrat 13 hrs ago #37

This is not normal. awesomerwb1 13 hrs ago #39

Now that their Fearful Leader has allowed it, the maggots come out of the woodwork to vote for it. Wonder Why 13 hrs ago #40

What menace does orange have up his sleeve? Clouds Passing 13 hrs ago #43

Epstein's brother is claiming that they are "scrubbing the files." Certainly months to do so. Evolve Dammit 12 hrs ago #47

Excuse me, Clay Higgins C_U_L8R 12 hrs ago #53

Too lopsided. Something's fishy SpankMe 10 hrs ago #59

I'm not getting my hopes up. Aussie105 5 hrs ago #65