Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: House overwhelmingly passes bill to release Jeffrey Epstein files [View all]the Republican Politicians can hardly wait to get rid of him, like all of us........
They are just stalling to have time to think through how they are gonna get rid of Vance, and corruptly and illegally install Steven Miller as president and Russell Vought as VP. I am sure the Republican USSC justices, and Senate Republicans will back them up...........
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
House overwhelmingly passes bill to release Jeffrey Epstein files [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Tuesday
OP
They'll try it and maybe get away with it for a while. But there are ways to read through redactions.
ancianita
Tuesday
#21
They have the most to lose, and with women were the biggest voting demographic on Nov 4.
ancianita
Tuesday
#55
I don't think this is going to matter much. My comment from another thread:
InstantGratification
Tuesday
#27
The pedophile party really had no choice. It was going to be passed by the Democrats and self preservation
LiberalArkie
Tuesday
#15
Not one Republican can go back to their states & get re-elected after voting no. That's why they know they had no choice
ancianita
Tuesday
#22
The Guardians Of Pedophiles can't install anyone other than the 2nd in line.
Justice matters.
Tuesday
#61
He said he voted no because he is worried about the "innocent people" named in the files.
SunSeeker
Tuesday
#11
Make no mistake, almost all of the Republicans (the 4 who signed the discharge petition excepted)
Wiz Imp
Tuesday
#6
Agree but Trump did tell them to vote for it... also Johnson is trying to create a provision to exempt perpetrators...
chowder66
Tuesday
#8
The Repukes who voted "yes" are under the impression that the Senate vote will be "no"
FakeNoose
Tuesday
#46
Ahhh, but he will do something. That is what this BS investigation into Clinton et al is about.
Bev54
Tuesday
#26
All Republicans. Just can't find their names yet, nor will, most likely for suspicious reasons.
ancianita
Tuesday
#29
When will anything new actually be released? Will Trump block all the way to the Supreme court?
ChicagoTeamster
Tuesday
#19
Louisiana Republican Clay Higgins voted against the bill. Two Republicans and three Democrats did not vote.
IronLionZion
Tuesday
#23
That's the question about those who abstained. Right? When their names are known they'll have some 'splainin' to do.
ancianita
Tuesday
#31
Up next: the Senate does everything in its power to prevent this from coming up for a vote
Warpy
Tuesday
#33
Now that their Fearful Leader has allowed it, the maggots come out of the woodwork to vote for it.
Wonder Why
Tuesday
#40
Epstein's brother is claiming that they are "scrubbing the files." Certainly months to do so.
Evolve Dammit
Tuesday
#47