Latest Breaking News

HighFired49

(445 posts)

49. Never happen as long as Dump is in office

Tue Nov 18, 2025, 05:31 PM

Yesterday

I don't believe that the files will be released as long as Dump is in office, if ever. All they have to do is to start an investigation of one of the other actors in those files, or at least say that they are. They can then state that the files can't be released because of an ongoing investigation involving another person/persons in the case. Voila!! Problem gone. Dump is being just tooooo nonchalant about the whole issue at this point for me to feel like he is even mildly concerned about the situation..

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

California Kid MrsCheaplaugh

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

House overwhelmingly passes bill to release Jeffrey Epstein files [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

Almost unanimous... 427-1, 5 abstaining. ancianita Yesterday #1

No shit?! RussBLib Yesterday #2

No shit! Here's the link. ancianita Yesterday #5

Well Trump told them is was okay to vote for release. hadEnuf Yesterday #10

They'll try it and maybe get away with it for a while. But there are ways to read through redactions. ancianita Yesterday #21

Sadly, my thoughts too hibbing Yesterday #45

They have the most to lose, and with women were the biggest voting demographic on Nov 4. ancianita Yesterday #55

The fact that Trump and the GOP have fought this release hadEnuf Yesterday #56

I don't think this is going to matter much. My comment from another thread: InstantGratification Yesterday #27

I believe you. ancianita Yesterday #42

The pedophile party really had no choice. It was going to be passed by the Democrats and self preservation LiberalArkie Yesterday #15

Not one Republican can go back to their states & get re-elected after voting no. That's why they know they had no choice ancianita Yesterday #22

Eggxactly LiberalArkie Yesterday #24

It's got to get pass the Senate & Trump NotHardly Yesterday #28

Never happen as long as Dump is in office HighFired49 Yesterday #49

Hell popsdenver Yesterday #54

The Guardians Of Pedophiles can't install anyone other than the 2nd in line. Justice matters. 23 hrs ago #61

Probably...... popsdenver 20 hrs ago #63

Now on to the new excuses Fullduplexxx Yesterday #3

The 1? Clay Higgins, of course. Bo Zarts Yesterday #4

He said he voted no because he is worried about the "innocent people" named in the files. SunSeeker Yesterday #11

What about the innocent girls who were harmed? TexasBushwhacker 23 hrs ago #60

He doesn't give a shit about them. nt SunSeeker 22 hrs ago #62

His reasoning included a reference to "a rabid media" --: DeeDeeNY Yesterday #13

Either on the list durablend Yesterday #18

If you read his Wikipedia you will vanlassie Yesterday #38

Make no mistake, almost all of the Republicans (the 4 who signed the discharge petition excepted) Wiz Imp Yesterday #6

Agree but Trump did tell them to vote for it... also Johnson is trying to create a provision to exempt perpetrators... chowder66 Yesterday #8

ABOUT TIME ! republianmushroom Yesterday #7

Wow! This tide has turned FakeNoose Yesterday #9

Brave warriors who have survived some of the most horrific crimes . LEMAUS Yesterday #16

Please quakerboy Yesterday #20

The Repukes who voted "yes" are under the impression that the Senate vote will be "no" FakeNoose Yesterday #46

Were they? quakerboy 6 hrs ago #68

Nice! Photos are good optics that stick in voters' memories. ancianita Yesterday #25

Ahhh, but he will do something. That is what this BS investigation into Clinton et al is about. Bev54 Yesterday #26

Sorry, you first HighFired49 Yesterday #51

Not a problem all voices deserve to be heard. Bev54 Yesterday #57

There is a petition on Change.org Linda ladeewolf Yesterday #34

Finally some good news. LEMAUS Yesterday #12

They have been samplegirl Yesterday #14

who are the 5 that did not vote? nt orleans Yesterday #17

All Republicans. Just can't find their names yet, nor will, most likely for suspicious reasons. ancianita Yesterday #29

Here is the Roll Call vote - Not Voting were 3 (D)s and 2 (R)s BumRushDaShow Yesterday #41

Thank you! Now we can ask them why. ancianita Yesterday #44

Well Mikie Sherrill is now governor-elect of NJ BumRushDaShow Yesterday #50

Ah, thanks, I didn't catch that, being used to two of a number of names... ancianita Yesterday #52

3 dems, 2 Rs orleans 19 hrs ago #64

right ancianita 16 hrs ago #66

Just found this article BumRushDaShow 14 hrs ago #67

When will anything new actually be released? Will Trump block all the way to the Supreme court? ChicagoTeamster Yesterday #19

Louisiana Republican Clay Higgins voted against the bill. Two Republicans and three Democrats did not vote. IronLionZion Yesterday #23

That's the question about those who abstained. Right? When their names are known they'll have some 'splainin' to do. ancianita Yesterday #31

No but he appears on Fox News regularly. Initech Yesterday #32

That 1 no vote is sticking out like a sore thumb! Initech Yesterday #30

He's probably in the files. nt iemanja Yesterday #36

He's probably in a safe district FakeNoose Yesterday #48

100% he did this to get airtime on Fox and Newsmax and boost his profile. Initech Yesterday #58

Up next: the Senate does everything in its power to prevent this from coming up for a vote Warpy Yesterday #33

Don't get too excited iemanja Yesterday #35

Full stop UT_democrat Yesterday #37

This is not normal. awesomerwb1 Yesterday #39

Now that their Fearful Leader has allowed it, the maggots come out of the woodwork to vote for it. Wonder Why Yesterday #40

What menace does orange have up his sleeve? Clouds Passing Yesterday #43

Epstein's brother is claiming that they are "scrubbing the files." Certainly months to do so. Evolve Dammit Yesterday #47

Excuse me, Clay Higgins C_U_L8R Yesterday #53

Too lopsided. Something's fishy SpankMe Yesterday #59

I'm not getting my hopes up. Aussie105 18 hrs ago #65