Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

awesomerwb1

(4,935 posts)
39. This is not normal.
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 04:40 PM
Yesterday

Something shady is happening behind the scenes. Don't ever ever ever trust the gop. Ever.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Almost unanimous... 427-1, 5 abstaining. ancianita Yesterday #1
No shit?! RussBLib Yesterday #2
No shit! Here's the link. ancianita Yesterday #5
Well Trump told them is was okay to vote for release. hadEnuf Yesterday #10
They'll try it and maybe get away with it for a while. But there are ways to read through redactions. ancianita Yesterday #21
Sadly, my thoughts too hibbing Yesterday #45
They have the most to lose, and with women were the biggest voting demographic on Nov 4. ancianita Yesterday #55
The fact that Trump and the GOP have fought this release hadEnuf Yesterday #56
I don't think this is going to matter much. My comment from another thread: InstantGratification Yesterday #27
I believe you. ancianita Yesterday #42
The pedophile party really had no choice. It was going to be passed by the Democrats and self preservation LiberalArkie Yesterday #15
Not one Republican can go back to their states & get re-elected after voting no. That's why they know they had no choice ancianita Yesterday #22
Eggxactly LiberalArkie Yesterday #24
It's got to get pass the Senate & Trump NotHardly Yesterday #28
Never happen as long as Dump is in office HighFired49 Yesterday #49
Hell popsdenver Yesterday #54
The Guardians Of Pedophiles can't install anyone other than the 2nd in line. Justice matters. Yesterday #61
Probably...... popsdenver 23 hrs ago #63
Now on to the new excuses Fullduplexxx Yesterday #3
The 1? Clay Higgins, of course. Bo Zarts Yesterday #4
He said he voted no because he is worried about the "innocent people" named in the files. SunSeeker Yesterday #11
What about the innocent girls who were harmed? TexasBushwhacker Yesterday #60
He doesn't give a shit about them. nt SunSeeker Yesterday #62
His reasoning included a reference to "a rabid media" --: DeeDeeNY Yesterday #13
Either on the list durablend Yesterday #18
If you read his Wikipedia you will vanlassie Yesterday #38
Make no mistake, almost all of the Republicans (the 4 who signed the discharge petition excepted) Wiz Imp Yesterday #6
Agree but Trump did tell them to vote for it... also Johnson is trying to create a provision to exempt perpetrators... chowder66 Yesterday #8
ABOUT TIME ! republianmushroom Yesterday #7
Wow! This tide has turned FakeNoose Yesterday #9
Brave warriors who have survived some of the most horrific crimes . LEMAUS Yesterday #16
Please quakerboy Yesterday #20
The Repukes who voted "yes" are under the impression that the Senate vote will be "no" FakeNoose Yesterday #46
Were they? quakerboy 10 hrs ago #68
Nice! Photos are good optics that stick in voters' memories. ancianita Yesterday #25
Ahhh, but he will do something. That is what this BS investigation into Clinton et al is about. Bev54 Yesterday #26
Sorry, you first HighFired49 Yesterday #51
Not a problem all voices deserve to be heard. Bev54 Yesterday #57
There is a petition on Change.org Linda ladeewolf Yesterday #34
Finally some good news. LEMAUS Yesterday #12
They have been samplegirl Yesterday #14
who are the 5 that did not vote? nt orleans Yesterday #17
All Republicans. Just can't find their names yet, nor will, most likely for suspicious reasons. ancianita Yesterday #29
Here is the Roll Call vote - Not Voting were 3 (D)s and 2 (R)s BumRushDaShow Yesterday #41
Thank you! Now we can ask them why. ancianita Yesterday #44
Well Mikie Sherrill is now governor-elect of NJ BumRushDaShow Yesterday #50
Ah, thanks, I didn't catch that, being used to two of a number of names... ancianita Yesterday #52
3 dems, 2 Rs orleans 23 hrs ago #64
right ancianita 19 hrs ago #66
Just found this article BumRushDaShow 18 hrs ago #67
When will anything new actually be released? Will Trump block all the way to the Supreme court? ChicagoTeamster Yesterday #19
Louisiana Republican Clay Higgins voted against the bill. Two Republicans and three Democrats did not vote. IronLionZion Yesterday #23
That's the question about those who abstained. Right? When their names are known they'll have some 'splainin' to do. ancianita Yesterday #31
No but he appears on Fox News regularly. Initech Yesterday #32
That 1 no vote is sticking out like a sore thumb! Initech Yesterday #30
He's probably in the files. nt iemanja Yesterday #36
He's probably in a safe district FakeNoose Yesterday #48
100% he did this to get airtime on Fox and Newsmax and boost his profile. Initech Yesterday #58
Up next: the Senate does everything in its power to prevent this from coming up for a vote Warpy Yesterday #33
Don't get too excited iemanja Yesterday #35
Full stop UT_democrat Yesterday #37
This is not normal. awesomerwb1 Yesterday #39
Now that their Fearful Leader has allowed it, the maggots come out of the woodwork to vote for it. Wonder Why Yesterday #40
What menace does orange have up his sleeve? Clouds Passing Yesterday #43
Epstein's brother is claiming that they are "scrubbing the files." Certainly months to do so. Evolve Dammit Yesterday #47
Excuse me, Clay Higgins C_U_L8R Yesterday #53
Too lopsided. Something's fishy SpankMe Yesterday #59
I'm not getting my hopes up. Aussie105 22 hrs ago #65
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House overwhelmingly pass...»Reply #39