Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(172,903 posts)
10. MaddowBlog-Republicans use spending bill to empower themselves to sue over phone records searches
Tue Nov 11, 2025, 05:36 PM
Nov 11

GOP senators are no longer just whining about “Arctic Frost,” they’re now giving themselves the ability to file civil lawsuits over the faux controversy.

When the facts aren’t in your favor … replace the facts with lies.

Republicans use spending bill to empower themselves to sue over phone records searches www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

@jimrissmiller.bsky.social 2025-11-11T20:13:01.063Z

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/republicans-use-spending-bill-empower-sue-phone-records-searches-rcna243199

But as the process moves forward, the public is still learning more about some of the key details that were included in the bill. The New York Times reported, for example, on a provocative provision that GOP members tucked into the package.

A spending package expected to be approved as part of a deal to reopen the government would create a wide legal avenue for senators to sue for as much as half a million dollars each when federal investigators search their phone records without notifying them. The provision ... appears to immediately allow for eight G.O.P. senators to sue the government over their phone records being seized in the course of the investigation by Jack Smith, the former special counsel, into the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.


The Times’ report added that this element, which is now likely to become law, would require federal investigators to notify senators about phone records searches, except in instances in which members are themselves a target of an investigation.

The provision “is retroactive to 2022,” the Times noted......

The New York Times reported in early October, “The analysis of phone toll records is a common investigative tactic. ... Such toll record information does not include the contents of conversations, which would require a court-approved wiretap.”

A related analysis from CNN explained that there was nothing especially surprising about any of this.

We already knew that the phone records of some lawmakers were seized in Smith’s probe, because the Justice Department had to overcome legal hurdles posed by the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause. And it’s difficult to understand how Smith ever could have conducted such a probe without obtaining some phone records of lawmakers. That’s because Trump’s pressure on lawmakers was a key part of his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. ... It would seem very difficult to piece together a case without understanding who was talking to whom, and when.


MSNBC’s Ken Dilanian emphasized a related point, noting that the former special counsel’s final report, released earlier this year, made note of these same toll records.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Fucking of course. There are probably land mines all over this. Drum Nov 10 #1
6 weeks of dodging Town Halls. Here's what they were hatching instead... mpcamb Nov 11 #23
Planning their smash and grab extortion plan. Irish_Dem Nov 11 #26
Yep, Schumer has to go, either he knew about it or should have. Either way he has to go. dem4decades Nov 11 #29
The Dems that voted to allow this should have to pay the damages for this corruption. walkingman Nov 10 #2
Seriously? What makes you think he'll lose this suit? ancianita Nov 11 #12
I guess because I do not trust our justice system...especially at the higher levels. walkingman Nov 11 #13
You guess? Forget the system. The DOJ just lost thousands of lawyers. ancianita Nov 11 #15
If they can sue federal employees, why not go after the big guy? FakeNoose Nov 10 #3
Skullduggery is their go-to. BurnDoubt Nov 10 #4
Now begs the question: Polybius Nov 10 #5
Important questions. yellow dahlia Nov 10 #6
Senators are cordial to each other, what a gift. dem4decades Nov 11 #27
We know the answer to that question. Irish_Dem Nov 11 #28
This bill provision is unconstitutional, as it is retroactive to 2022, capturing Jack Smith's 2023 subpoenas. SunSeeker Nov 10 #7
He'll handle this. It's doubtful Smith's going to be held liable by the DC District Court. ancianita Nov 11 #11
But DOJ will happily pay these scumbag GOP insurrectionist senators $500k each. SunSeeker Nov 11 #18
Not necessarily. Each senator will have to pay his own legal fees for making their case to the DC Circuit. ancianita Nov 11 #22
The senators don't even need to file a lawsuit. They can just submit a government claim. SunSeeker Nov 11 #24
I stand corrected. I thought I read that they each individually qualified to sue for damages. Sorry. ancianita Nov 11 #25
But Lawrence said it was a win SamuelTheThird Nov 10 #8
How about you link it. I watch Lawrence all the time and never once heard that. ancianita Nov 11 #16
He didn't call it a win. He called it a compromise. nt SunSeeker Nov 11 #19
It just keeps getting better. iemanja Nov 11 #9
MaddowBlog-Republicans use spending bill to empower themselves to sue over phone records searches LetMyPeopleVote Nov 11 #10
Incredible Senate-ing here as senators make this applicable just to them, not House members LetMyPeopleVote Nov 11 #20
Thank you DINO's. republianmushroom Nov 11 #14
Think they didn't read that bill? Who were the DINO's, huh? Name them. ancianita Nov 11 #17
Very strange to think how this works karynnj Nov 11 #21
I believe it was FBI investigators which makes it doubly puzzling FakeNoose Nov 11 #30
Chip Roy wants this provision removed LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Shutdown Deal Would Let S...»Reply #10