Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Democratic leader offers deal to reopen government, but Republicans sneer [View all]Bluetus
(1,938 posts)Killing the subsidy before the election won't really be noticed. The public at large will not pay attention to that until the open enrollment period, that's only a few days before the election. I don't think we can win the mid-terms with that being the primary issue. But I think we can win if we have a proactive platform of plans that attack the fascism and lawlessness of Trump..
So I don't think it is helpful to kick it only to September 2026. That won't help us win, and once the Republicans kill it, it will be very hard to bring it back, especially if we don't control the Senate.
And allowing the GOP to kill it in the lame duck period is also a loser.
The only period that makes sense to me is after the new House is seated in 2027.
====
It is important to understand that this affects 22 million Americans. That is a significant number, but that also means that it just doesn't affect 80% of the voters. A more powerful electoral issue would be to add dental and visual benefits to real Medicare. That is how the Advantage scam works. With Advantage, they save a lot of money on hospitalization simply by denying treatments, and they give some of that back in the form of glasses, hearing aids and dental work. That affects 70 million people directly and another 30 million are close enough to the Medicare age to care about this.