Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

choie

(5,862 posts)
23. I wonder if trump understands
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 11:00 PM
Jul 18

that Murdoch et al will be able to request discovery and he'll have to testify?

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hey, Trump! PJMcK Jul 18 #1
Taco. He'll drop it before any discovery needs to happen. Scrivener7 Jul 18 #2
If he drops it, Murdoch could counter-sue for vexacious litigation. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 18 #7
Not successfully onenote Jul 18 #17
Unless the POS in the WH can show they acted with malice, and knowingly made a false statement with lostincalifornia Jul 18 #3
kelleyanne conjob strikes again??? - n/t lapfog_1 Jul 18 #4
What insane lawyer signed that frivolous pleading under FRCP Rule 11? Tarzanrock Jul 18 #5
Found This Thread On reddit r/law That You Might Appreciate... The Court System Is Now His Protection Racket MayReasonRule Saturday #35
He sues for frivolous reasons all the time. ShazzieB Saturday #40
The new f word. twodogsbarking Jul 18 #6
If you listen carefully you can hear the rattling of attorney's swords. twodogsbarking Jul 18 #8
Discovery should be fun Ritabert Jul 18 #9
Why? What do you think the Journal will be seeking to discover that would be relevant to their defense? onenote Saturday #34
Truth Is Generally Considered An Abolute And Complete Defense Against Defamation Claims MayReasonRule Saturday #37
Actually, the burden in this case is on Trump, not WSJ -- and that's why its a dangerous case for the WSJ onenote Saturday #38
So why is this a dangerous case for the WSJ? SCOTUS MayReasonRule Saturday #39
More dangerous to everyone involved with getting the story published IbogaProject Saturday #42
Hey Rupe! Don't forget to demand Attorneys Fees and costs! no_hypocrisy Jul 18 #10
Do I really have to root for Rupert Murdoch now? ificandream Jul 18 #11
Root for Joe Palazzolo...he's a good reporter Prairie Gates Saturday #25
Trump sues Wall Street Journal's publisher and 2 reporters over Epstein article LetMyPeopleVote Jul 18 #12
Maddow Blog-Following Epstein report, Trump files lawsuit against WSJ, Rupert Murdoch and others LetMyPeopleVote Jul 18 #13
If The President has immunity, he shouldn't be able to file lawsuits on his own behalf. ruet Jul 18 #14
Just do it felon, just do it. republianmushroom Jul 18 #15
id love for teh wsj to subpeona the epstein files during discovery.... moonshinegnomie Jul 18 #16
It wouldn't succeed onenote Jul 18 #18
This will get interesting orangecrush Jul 18 #19
20 years ago he was apparently more literate and articulate. Evidence of diminished capacity? Marcuse Jul 18 #20
Murdoch will 'settle' for million$ pfitz59 Jul 18 #21
News Corps BumRushDaShow Saturday #28
Has E. Jean Carroll been paid yet? tonekat Jul 18 #22
I wonder if trump understands choie Jul 18 #23
He'l deny he wrote the card. He admit he was friends with Epstein prior to 2004. onenote Sunday #43
Analysis from MSNBC's Lisa Rubin with Nicole Wallace pat_k Saturday #24
"seize back the narrative"... IthinkThereforeIAM Saturday #29
Souther District of Florida johnnyfins Saturday #26
My first thought when I seen the location of the filing... IthinkThereforeIAM Saturday #30
It's my understanding that there are only two absolute defenses in law and they concern libel and slander. MIButterfly Saturday #27
Good point... IthinkThereforeIAM Saturday #31
A country to run? lonely bird Saturday #36
I'm... myohmy2 Saturday #32
Can't wait for discovery dlk Saturday #33
What is the discovery phase of a libel suit kkmarie Saturday #41
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump sues Murdoch, Dow J...»Reply #23