Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(159,166 posts)
Tue Jul 8, 2025, 03:54 PM Jul 8

Supreme Court clears the way for Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce [View all]

Last edited Tue Jul 8, 2025, 07:45 PM - Edit history (3)

Source: AP

Updated 4:39 PM EDT, July 8, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the way for President Donald Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce despite warnings that critical government services will be lost and hundreds of thousands of federal employees will be out of their jobs.

The justices overrode lower court orders that temporarily froze the cuts, which have been led by the Department of Government Efficiency.

The court said in an unsigned order that no specific cuts were in front of the justices, only an executive order issued by Trump and an administration directive for agencies to undertake job reductions. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only dissenting vote, accusing her colleagues of a "demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this President's legally dubious actions in an emergency posture."

Jackson warned of enormous real-world consequences. "This executive action promises mass employee terminations, widespread cancellation of federal programs and services, and the dismantling of much of the Federal Government as Congress has created it," she wrote.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-trump-mass-firings-151e14da3186d34eab1923c45831c1b6



Just breaking. Short article at post time.

This is shadow document stuff and bizarre technicality.

Link to RULING (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1174_h3ci.pdf

REFERENCE - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143470488


Article updated.

Previous article -

Updated 3:54 PM EDT, July 8, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the way for President Donald Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce despite warnings that critical government services will be lost and hundreds of thousands of federal employees will be out of their jobs.

The justices overrode lower court orders that temporarily froze the cuts, which have been led by the Department of Government Efficiency.

The court said in an unsigned order that no specific cuts were in front of the justices, only an executive order issued by Trump and an administration directive for agencies to undertake job reductions. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only dissenting vote, accusing her colleagues of a "demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this President's legally dubious actions in an emergency posture."

Trump has repeatedly said voters gave him a mandate to remake the federal government, and he tapped billionaire ally Elon Musk to lead the charge through DOGE. Musk recently left his role.



Original article -

Updated 3:50 PM EDT, July 8, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the way for President Donald Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce despite warnings that critical government services will be lost and hundreds of thousands of federal employees will be out of their jobs.

The justices overrode lower court orders that temporarily froze the cuts, which have been led by the Department of Government Efficiency.

The court said in an unsigned order that no specific cuts were in front of the justices, only an executive order issued by Trump and an administration directive for agencies to undertake job reductions.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only dissenting vote, accusing her colleagues of a "demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this President's legally dubious actions in an emergency posture."

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Sotomayor and Kagan signed on to the opinion, one has to wonder about it's import. FadedMullet Jul 8 #1
My question, as well. LauraInLA Jul 8 #2
FWIW, my understanding in a post downthread. pat_k Jul 8 #14
Thank you! LauraInLA Jul 8 #15
Handing him the rope to hang himself? C_U_L8R Jul 8 #8
FWIW, my understanding in a post downthread. pat_k Jul 8 #13
No... it's a significant loss similar to restricting national injunctions FBaggins Jul 10 #20
I'm hopeful that some kindly, considerate coorporations will take over those ... chouchou Jul 8 #3
Trump wouldn't care. Prof. Toru Tanaka Jul 8 #5
The issue they ruled on to me seems too general and ambiguous, however, rather general, I suspect more lostincalifornia Jul 8 #4
The rape of a nation by an experienced rapist. twodogsbarking Jul 8 #6
WaPo article says the two liberal Justices sided with the 6 pack because-- Silent Type Jul 8 #7
Yeah that's why I mentioned the "technicality" BumRushDaShow Jul 8 #9
SCOTUS is worthless angrychair Jul 8 #10
Sickening LymphocyteLover Jul 8 #11
My understanding is that it is actually a bit of a mixed decision. pat_k Jul 8 #12
Thank you. I think that you're right in your analysis of this and much closer to shortstop than left field. FadedMullet Jul 9 #18
Maybe it is this.............. DENVERPOPS Jul 8 #16
Damn, there's that word "mandate" again... slightlv Jul 8 #17
It hasn't for decades. Igel Jul 9 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court clears the ...