Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

William Seger

(11,786 posts)
9. The Nader Fallacy
Sun Jun 8, 2025, 08:51 AM
Jun 2025

The Nader Fallacy is the belief that someone who can't even come close to winning the nomination of either major party could nonetheless win the general election running as a third-party candidate. It's equivalent to believing that less than half of all Democrats plus less than half of Republicans could somehow add up to more than half of all voters.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They head up their ass party. HUTA Walleye Jun 2025 #1
The "Forgot to Flush Party" was the first thing I thought. hunter Jun 2025 #15
Yang again? How many times has he been rejected by voters now? brush Jun 2025 #2
I can see Musk creating Dem4life1970 Jun 2025 #19
Hiel Hitler salutes and all. And Yang won't object as long as he gets the attention he seeks. brush Jun 2025 #35
very busy Be Leave On Jun 2025 #37
Fuck both of them Sanity Claws Jun 2025 #3
Here we fucking go again. This is why we can't have nice things anymore: third parties. Vinca Jun 2025 #4
Nothing wrong with 3rd parties. Jirel Jun 2025 #6
3rd parties do not work in a closed two party system wwith winner takes all elections. Force runoffs in ... marble falls Jun 2025 #7
That's what many people don't understand PSPS Jun 2025 #17
third-partier is just a political life phase cadoman Jun 2025 #25
Automatic ranked voting run offs is another way that can works for this Tom Rinaldo Jun 2025 #24
Third parties Cirsium Jun 2025 #27
The first three weren't third parties. carpetbagger Jun 2025 #29
Hair splitting maybe? Cirsium Jun 2025 #31
Probably hair splitting. But... carpetbagger Jun 2025 #40
I know the history Cirsium Jun 9 #43
We're not a parliamentary system like other countries. That's why 3rd parties screw up the works. I don't think Vinca Jun 2025 #18
In the United States, we build our coalitions before the general election Gore1FL Jun 2025 #20
That's actually a pretty good way to look at it. Lucky Luciano Jun 2025 #22
Multiple parties won't work in our current system. cab67 Jun 2025 #21
Third parties have never won the presidency in the u.s. ThreeNoSeep Jun 2025 #32
I go with option 2. LisaM Jun 2025 #33
Oh. ThreeNoSeep Jun 10 #45
Well, I probably use the term loosely, but... LisaM Jun 10 #46
I hear you ThreeNoSeep Jun 11 #47
What a loser. Jirel Jun 2025 #5
Battle lines are being drawn nt Javaman Jun 2025 #8
The Nader Fallacy William Seger Jun 2025 #9
Yang "believes the Tesla CEO has what it takes" genxlib Jun 2025 #10
E-Loon is a sociopath wolfie001 Jun 2025 #12
Does he want to pick off Dem voters and help the fascists too? wolfie001 Jun 2025 #11
Musk is a 'political outsider' like Leonard Leo and the Koch Brothers ToxMarz Jun 2025 #13
Not this jerk again... travelingthrulife Jun 2025 #14
Oh...such a winning combo..... PortTack Jun 2025 #16
Gag me with a spoon. Martin68 Jun 2025 #23
The Techbro Micropenis Party? n/t CousinIT Jun 2025 #26
Call it the "Wealthy Tech bro party" Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2025 #28
A few possible names Icanthinkformyself Jun 2025 #30
Remember this guy? BumRushDaShow Jun 2025 #34
I didn't know Yang was a moron. Now I do. hay rick Jun 2025 #36
Fuck these tech bros. They always think they are the smartest in the room, when they don't know jack shit. SunSeeker Jun 2025 #38
This will be DOA - Musk is Radioactive in Politics NEOBuckeye Jun 2025 #39
Agree. I thought Yang was smarter than this MadameButterfly Jun 2025 #41
Not just no, but Heil No Hekate Jun 9 #42
Really?! Oh, geeeebz... Go Away, dude! electric_blue68 Jun 9 #44
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Andrew Yang reaches out t...»Reply #9