Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(159,286 posts)

3. I just updated the OP with the latest - this is what Justice Jackson wrote

Reply to Scrivener7 (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 5, 2025, 10:43 AM

Jun 2025

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who wrote the opinion for the court, agreed with Marlean Ames, who argued that it was unconstitutional to have different standards for different groups of people. “Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone,” Jackson wrote.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

LauraInLA somsai Polybius k_buddy762

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court sides with woman claiming anti-straight job discrimination [View all] BumRushDaShow Jun 2025 OP

Because of course they did. Scrivener7 Jun 2025 #1

The decision was unanimous. Ocelot II Jun 2025 #2

I just updated the OP with the latest - this is what Justice Jackson wrote BumRushDaShow Jun 2025 #3

The decision just sends it back for adjudication mdbl Jun 2025 #4

Right. The headline is very misleading. yardwork Jun 2025 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author yardwork Jun 2025 #15

Please angrychair Jun 2025 #19

We'll see how it plays out in the courts mdbl Jun 2025 #21

This ruling angrychair Jun 2025 #23

Fragile White Syndrome is a new condition wolfie001 Jun 2025 #5

Justice Jackson wrote the unanimous opinion for the Court. Does she suffer from this affliction as well? tritsofme Jun 2025 #9

Oh great. Now I have to do some reading wolfie001 Jun 2025 #32

Fragile White Syndrome has been around since anti discrimination laws first began yellowdogintexas Jun 2025 #13

I'm tired of being picked on because I'm white. Hotler Jun 2025 #29

Hey! I'm white as well wolfie001 Jun 2025 #31

I'm right there with you. Another favorite is, "I'm tired of being picked on because of my liberal views.". Hotler Jun 2025 #33

You too! wolfie001 Jun 2025 #34

it was a 9-0 decision. all it means is she CAN sue moonshinegnomie Jun 2025 #6

I think DEI is officially DOA. Mosby Jun 2025 #7

This is the correct decision. WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2025 #8

Especially angrychair Jun 2025 #20

So...uh...why do you suppose Justice Jackson, who wrote the opinion, joined by Kagan and Sotomayor tritsofme Jun 2025 #24

If the shoe was on a minority's foot, would the SC even take the case? wolfie001 Jun 2025 #35

Apparently you dont understand the decision. Callie1979 Jun 2025 #26

Obviously. Dr. Strange Jun 2025 #22

So far, all three SC rulings that I'm seeing today have been unanimous Polybius Jun 2025 #10

So you can't take sides against gays either. Am I interpreting correctly? twodogsbarking Jun 2025 #11

No. I'll let DU law experts explain, but the headline is misleading. yardwork Jun 2025 #16

Ah, the details. The devil isn't even hiding. twodogsbarking Jun 2025 #17

To clarify, I don't really think that gays are "anti-straight". They just aren't straight. twodogsbarking Jun 2025 #12

Even the courts are fucked angrychair Jun 2025 #18

They still have to win the suit Shrek Jun 2025 #25

This ruling angrychair Jun 2025 #28

"literally" everything? Numerous lawsuits in the past prove otherwise. Callie1979 Jun 2025 #27

It's like we haven't lived through the last 250 years angrychair Jun 2025 #30