Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cirsium

(2,440 posts)
31. As if that ever means anything.
Sat Apr 12, 2025, 01:28 PM
Apr 12

Right wing judges are dumping on that concept all the time.

Senator Hubert Humphrey said that the act exposed deportees to bureaucratic tyranny and warned that deportations "without review would be the beginning of a police state".

You don't think it should be subject to judicial review, especially since it conflicts with the Bill of Rights?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

APPEAL ! ! ! no_hypocrisy Apr 11 #1
He'll probably lose. Igel Apr 11 #17
No free speech for non-citizens. But soon that will apply to citizens as well. surfered Apr 11 #2
Cry HAVOC... GiqueCee Apr 11 #3
Have to add the video BumRushDaShow Apr 12 #22
I paraphrased Marc Antony's words from Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar"... GiqueCee Apr 19 #43
I have ideas markie Apr 11 #4
There's a separate, coincident case going on in New Jersey, so he can't actually be deported yet... Native Apr 11 #5
How come there is a second trial? question everything Apr 12 #29
Here ya go... Native Apr 12 #39
This is pretty insane. Balatro Apr 11 #6
Nazi judge. Basso8vb Apr 11 #7
No reason to deploy that epithet maxsolomon Apr 11 #12
Are you OK with this? Cirsium Apr 12 #25
I'm ok with the decision if she believes she's following the law Polybius Apr 12 #28
As if that ever means anything. Cirsium Apr 12 #31
I'm am not a lawyer Polybius Apr 12 #32
Your opinion, of course Cirsium Apr 12 #34
My opinion is rather complicated Polybius Apr 12 #36
Stupid to protest? Cirsium Apr 12 #38
I didn't say that I support Rubio's actions Polybius Apr 12 #40
I guess Cirsium Apr 12 #41
The critical point that seems to be shouted down in all this... GiqueCee Apr 19 #44
The Judge's decision? If that aligns with the law, then yes. maxsolomon Apr 14 #42
Appointed in January 2023 by the US Department of Justice's Executive Office for Immigration Review Polybius Apr 12 #18
Are you OK with it? Cirsium Apr 12 #26
My heart breaks Scubamatt Apr 11 #8
So it boils down to this judge blessing the notion moniss Apr 11 #9
Sounds to me as if slightlv Apr 11 #10
Immigration courts are article 1 courts. Nonnia Bisnez Apr 11 #11
Article II Judges & Courts. Part of the DOJ, specifically the Executive Office for Immigration Review n/t 24601 Apr 11 #16
'Pawns': Critics blast 'fake' judge who ruled Trump can deport Columbia activist LetMyPeopleVote Apr 11 #13
Trump's fascist state is complete iemanja Apr 11 #14
Fascism's darkness has fallen on this country. sinkingfeeling Apr 11 #15
Unless and until the SCOTUS overrules Judge Jamee Comans, we are all Mahmoud Khalil now. ancianita Apr 12 #19
That judge is one of the so-called "Article II" (administrative) judges BumRushDaShow Apr 12 #20
Hizzonner Comans... GiqueCee Apr 12 #21
"Hurronner" Comans. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 12 #23
Thanks for the correction... GiqueCee Apr 12 #24
Dunno about Wavy Gravy, he said a lot of wise and thoughtful stuff. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 12 #33
HA! GiqueCee Apr 12 #35
Like I said: Late sixties. I think '71 was still in the late sixties, it's all a bit blurry. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 12 #37
I don't understand how this can be either legal or constitutional. Martin68 Apr 12 #27
Once all the appeals are exhausted, will he be allowed to leave on his own accord? question everything Apr 12 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US judge rules Mahmoud Kh...»Reply #31