Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Jerry2144

(3,104 posts)

2. If they successfully redacted the incriminating things about Rs

Reply to madamesilverspurs (Original post)

Wed Nov 19, 2025, 05:09 PM

Wednesday

And only left the not-Republican names visible, then people will assume that the redacted name is the Felon’s or any R politician. I think it would backfire badly. Anything hidden or omitted will bite them, especially when the truth peaks out or is released by a more honest national government like Canada or Uk.

Either the whole files come out, or they pull BS to lock them away.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

kcoates

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Some things are just not possible. [View all] madamesilverspurs Wednesday OP

Uncut troves are out there. DoJ does not have the only set. marble falls Wednesday #1

If they successfully redacted the incriminating things about Rs Jerry2144 Wednesday #2

Today (11/19) Elizabeth McLaughlin, Substack, had an hour's long program that will put an end to the lies in2herbs Wednesday #3