General Discussion

rather than putting towar much better use is equally laughable. (In this case, "better use" means using the money to DEFEAT GOP incumbents and FLIP SEATS in swing-districts and swing-states... OR... "better use" means to spend the money defending seats in areas that are historically swing-states or swing-districts where the Dem incumbent is threatened, or when the Dem nominee might not be able to pull off a win.

A one-for-one exchange (obviously for purity and vanity and virtue-signaling reasons) serves no good purpose, especially when it does absolutely NOTHING with regard to helping the Democrats regain control of Congress. But for every GOP seat that we flip, that gives us a TWO-SEAT advantage that we didn't have before.

Laugh-it-up! The math is easy. The hard part (for many) is being able to see the big picture and make strategic moves rather than emotional ones or being motivated by wanting revenge against Democrats.