Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Buddyzbuddy

(1,926 posts)
21. All that on top of which they're attempting to
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 06:27 PM
Yesterday

perpetrate this criminal fraud against a person that has the most knowledge and experience of the system of which they're trying to use to punish him. The audacity is astounding.

They are too stupid to know what they don't know and too criminal to get help from those that do but are unwilling to commit crimes on their behalf.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Just the fact that the entire federal gov is run by a criminal organisation is an invitation to ignore all laws yaesu Yesterday #1
And then she had the gall to call that reporter and whine about not liking her coverage of her own incompetence. Marie Marie Yesterday #2
Stupid people very rarely know they're stupid Dread Pirate Roberts Yesterday #4
Love Billy Crystal's line Alice Kramden Yesterday #7
Her expiration date may be sooner.. BattleRow Yesterday #8
I suspect I'm not alone, but at times in my life I've had the misfortune of being "associated" with... the nelm Yesterday #19
Incompetence as deep as the ocean... BattleRow Yesterday #6
Halligan is the poster-child embodiment of the Peter Principle. lastlib Yesterday #20
It Is Highly Unlikely.... Laxman Yesterday #3
thats why the judge should no only dismiss with prejudice moonshinegnomie Yesterday #17
With my luck EYESORE 9001 Yesterday #5
You'd still go to a fed prison, which is probably better than MerryBlooms Yesterday #9
... or woman ... just to help you out there bud. NotHardly Yesterday #12
Thanks, but I think I'll hold off on that... Fil1957 Yesterday #10
Thanks, it's good to know I have options. Xavier Breath Yesterday #11
Only if you're magafied BaronChocula Yesterday #13
you forgot one... RussBLib Yesterday #14
WOOF! Maru Kitteh Yesterday #15
K&R UTUSN Yesterday #16
This judge lays out the law in order to apprise and clarify his perfect ruling they'll send to the DC appeals court. ancianita Yesterday #18
All that on top of which they're attempting to Buddyzbuddy Yesterday #21
Hopefully this is not a necessary caveat Dread Pirate Roberts Yesterday #22
Yes, but we can still contemplate it:) llmart Yesterday #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you've been contemplat...»Reply #21