Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FakeNoose

(39,533 posts)

4. Thanks TrueBlue ... I read this years ago and was horrified, but I forgot some of the details

Reply to Trueblue Texan (Reply #3)

Mon Nov 17, 2025, 12:41 PM

Monday

Upon re-reading this today, I now realize that the witness "Tiffany Doe" was an actual employee of Jeffrey Epstein. I was thinking maybe it was Tiffany Trump, but of course that was incorrect. It's a different Tiffany.

When this complaint was filed in California, the court did have an address for "Katie Johnson" but she can no longer be located at that address. I believe there has been a complete name change as well as relocation for "Katie Johnson's" entire family.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Revisiting Epstein's email - what if this was really about "Katie Johnson"? [View all] FakeNoose Monday OP

Good point viva la Monday #1

Here it is: Trueblue Texan Monday #3

Thanks TrueBlue ... I read this years ago and was horrified, but I forgot some of the details FakeNoose Monday #4

Interesting sidepoint-- viva la Monday #5

That would explain why they quickly outed the redacted victim Bok_Tukalo Monday #2

I've wondered the same. It would be good to get "Katie" under oath, mzmolly Monday #6

I think the real "Katie Johnson" would have to come forward on her own FakeNoose Monday #7