Revisiting Epstein's email - what if this was really about "Katie Johnson"? [View all]

The name "Katie Johnson" is fictitious, we all know that. The real woman we're calling Katie Johnson has disappeared from sight ever since Chump ran for the Presidency in 2016. She tried to bring a lawsuit against him as a grown woman, she would have been 36 or 37 at the time, saying that she had been raped by Chump when she was 13 years old.

"Katie Johnson" suddenly disappeared from sight and nobody has seen or heard from her since then. But Jeffrey Epstein KNEW her, and so did Ghislaine Maxwell. Katie Johnson had either joined Epstein's group, or she considered doing so. The alleged rape would have taken place in 1994 (or 95) at a party at Epstein's house in Manhattan. Chump was a regular attendee and he could have easily spotted Katie Johnson among the other girls and young women at the party.

So here's the thing: This email is written by Epstein to Maxwell in 2011, maybe 17 years later. Since we don't know "Katie Johnson's" real name he could be referring to "Katie" and not to Virginia Giuffre. Am I right? It's at least a possibility.

Virginia Giuffre says she hardly knew Chump except that she met him at Mar-A-Lago. Virginia worked at MAL for about 2 weeks and then she was hired away to work for Epstein at the Palm Beach mansion. She had no way to afford a plane ticket to New York and I'm sure her parents wouldn't have allowed it anyway. I find it hard to believe that the redacted name on this email is actually Virginia Roberts Giuffre.

But what if it's "Katie Johnson" - whom Jeffrey Epstein was well aware was raped and deflowered by Chump? Epstein was quite angry about it, and it might have even destroyed their friendship. What if Epstein had photos or videos of the event? It would have been perfect blackmail material, or even kompromat that could be handed over to Putin.

Hmmmm....