Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

AZJonnie

(2,340 posts)

1. We have no idea whether what the Epstein Estate released last week is in ANY SENSE "complete". None.

Reply to doublethink (Original post)

Mon Nov 17, 2025, 01:01 AM

Monday

We are wise to consider them a "sampling", unless somehow proven otherwise is what I'm saying.

Similarly, We The Public will have the exact same problem with any "version" of the Epstein Files that Trump's utterly corrupted DoJ puts out, should they deign to do so.

I want them "out", don't get me wrong, but *only* if it's truly *everything* (victim's names redacted, unless they consent otherwise of course).

Conversely, letting the 2025 Trump/Bondi "All-GOP-Guilt-Expurgated" Version to become what "the Epstein Files are", in the public's mind, is likely to be a bad outcome for the victims, who DESERVE TO SEE EVERYTHING COME OUT like they've asked!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

doublethink byronius BlueMTexpat Justice matters.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So now Taco wants them released? Great. [View all] doublethink Monday OP

We have no idea whether what the Epstein Estate released last week is in ANY SENSE "complete". None. AZJonnie Monday #1

the stuff released last week by epstein's brother is a "teaser" rampartd Monday #2

The emails were in response to a congressional subpoena Deminpenn Monday #4

His golden toilet is going to be flushing evidence non-stop. CentralMass Monday #3