Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(128,395 posts)
5. Oh boy, the irony is thick with this one.
Fri Nov 14, 2025, 12:20 PM
Nov 14

Ken Starr got a stiffy going after Clinton for consensual BJs from an adult. Yeah, that whole thing was sleazy as hell, fell under the general heading of sexual harassment in the workplace due to the power discrepancy, and Clinton should still be ashamed of himself. But many of us also recall the moral outrage Ken Starr was so pleased to stir up.

During Clinton’s testimony before a grand jury, all the questions had been about sex, and when Starr sent his impeachment referral to Congress in September, it contained gratuitous descriptions of specific sex acts, pornographic in nature. The goal was to incite new public outrage and, perhaps, humiliate his nemesis. Like the classic small-town preacher who rails against sexual deviance precisely because he finds it so titillating, Starr was even more ardent than some of his advisers in favoring a narrative laced with explicit detail. “I love the narrative!” Starr told aides who counseled greater restraint.

(For you young'uns who might not remember that whole episode, here's the story of how Christian Ken reveled vicariously in the polishing of Bill's knob for the delectation of the proto-MAGAs of the time: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/09/18/ken-starr-lewinsky-scandal-00057381)

Ken is no longer with us, and supposedly he regretted his excesses in that matter, but I think it's pretty hilarious in a dark way that the morally upright Mr. Starr was such a good buddy of not-so-morally-upright Jeffrey Epstein.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In the emails, "hugs" and...»Reply #5