Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

drmeow

(5,847 posts)
16. Yes, I do protest 7 year car loans
Fri Nov 14, 2025, 09:48 AM
Nov 14

Research shows that people are not good at making these sorts of decisions (Kahneman and Tversky won the Nobel Prize in Economics for it). History shows us the same thing. We don't "think" people aren't "smart" enough to make informed decisions - we KNOW the way human's brains work makes it HARDER for us to make SMART decisions even when we are informed. FFS people bought the whole supply side economics/Laffer curve when the most cursory analysis combined with some psychological knowledge shows that both fall apart very quickly. Look up judgment under heuristics or judgment under uncertainty. Even highly intelligent and highly educated people make terrible decisions, especially when it comes to money. And bankers KNOW this stuff. They KNOW people aren't good at making decisions like this and they propagandize their sales language in a way that makes it even harder for people to make these types of decisions.

Not all people have the level of privilege you have to allow yourself to take the risk of a longer loan and pay it off earlier. 50 year mortgages would double the amount of interest people would pay for the house to save a few hundred dollars. It is yet another way to transfer wealth from the poor and working class to bankers and the wealthy. It is a predatory practice pushed under the guise of "options." It is a form of usury in sense that it makes a loan that unfairly enriches the lender.

There are better ways to provide more choices for homeowners than allowing bankers to prey on them even more! How about we pay people enough money to be able to afford to buy a house?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Borrowers will have to dweller Nov 13 #1
We die and leave the debt to our children, who probably don't even want the house FakeNoose Nov 13 #2
I don't follow. You sell it in these instances. Same as if you had an unpaid 30 year mortgage. Melon Nov 13 #5
My point is that a lot more people will die with mortgages unpaid FakeNoose Nov 13 #7
But...who cares...really? People die or sell homes owing money everyday. The estate pays what is owed from the Melon Nov 13 #8
Do many people stay in a home long enough to pay off their mortgage? Mark.b2 Nov 13 #3
I thought I remembered 100 year mortgages in Japan. So I ran it through the machine: Hassin Bin Sober Nov 13 #4
There are still going to be 30 year mortgages. 15 year mortgages. I don't see the issue. Melon Nov 13 #6
This comes down to a question of drmeow Nov 13 #9
I don't think so.People need choice. I looked at a certain right wing website earlier. Melon Nov 13 #12
Yes, I do protest 7 year car loans drmeow Nov 14 #16
The alternative is renting. At zero equity Melon Nov 14 #17
The purpose of a 50-year mortgage is to enrich the lenders while offering very little benefit to the home buyer Wiz Imp Nov 13 #14
Why not? From repuke perspective, they plan to have everyone work till they drop dead. SheltieLover Nov 13 #10
It would mean they're basically renting their entire lives, and paying a humongous amount of interest. Sogo Nov 13 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Nov 13 #13
I would recommend taking the shortest mortgage you can afford. WarGamer Nov 13 #15
That's a really, really bad idea. For the first 20 years of the mortgage you wouldn't even be touching the Vinca Nov 14 #18
This is another stupid trump idea LetMyPeopleVote Nov 14 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What a 50-Year Mortgage W...»Reply #16