Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(2,640 posts)

2. Um, Chief Justice Roberts?

Thu Nov 13, 2025, 09:34 AM

Nov 13

This is what is known as quid pro quo despite the longtime analyst’s attempt to put the “lobbying game” fig leaf on it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The entire US govt is now totally pay to play. Irish_Dem Nov 13 #1

Greedy grubbing sh*tstains. NotHardly Nov 13 #4

Um, Chief Justice Roberts? lonely bird Nov 13 #2

The Supreme Court said gratuities after the fact are allowed. Irish_Dem Nov 13 #7

Only white male magas get gratuities. Irish_Dem Nov 13 #10

K&R BlueWavePsych Nov 13 #3

So it isn't just "his own money" like he said. Munu Nov 13 #9

The simplest definition of Fascism popsdenver Nov 13 #12

Just a coincidence, I'm sure.... Grins Nov 13 #13

He'll raise over a billion to build a "$300 million" travesty tinrobot Nov 13 #14

Who will pay for the Balls after it is built? pwb Nov 13 #15

knr nt cliffside Nov 13 #16

K&R UTUSN Nov 13 #17