General Discussion

Emrys

(8,793 posts)

28. It MIGHT be an inside joke, but to borrow the words of a past US president, "I want to hear him deny it."

Wed Nov 12, 2025, 11:13 PM

Nov 12

And that's going to be true of many loose ends and partially oblique hints and allegations in the files that will be dripped out in coming weeks.

You can tie yourself in knots with all this conjecture and "supposes", but that's about all that can be achieved without all the facts in some (possibly mythical) indisputable form.

Trump's innocence might be easier to defend and sustain if he and his regime weren't going to such great lengths to prevent the files being released.

It looks very fishy, smells worse, and given how many conspiracy theory-minded MAGAites there are and how hard Trump baited them on the stump with promises of a full reveal of all the sordid details, it's a brave strategy, Cotton ...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sorry to annoy everyone yet again, but much about that Epstein email hangs on the accuracy of one word [View all] AZJonnie Nov 12 OP

you seem very vested in all of this Skittles Nov 12 #1

to be honest every day I see dozens here incredibly vested in this. WarGamer Nov 12 #3

I have two answers for you AZJonnie Nov 12 #4

Is that email in question from the estate? OneGrassRoot Nov 12 #6

I cannot possibly imagine that the DoJ does/did not have everything the Estate has in this regard, long ago AZJonnie Nov 12 #8

Well, not just Biden's DOJ. Sorry to burst the bubble you'd prefer to exist in, but it is true. RockRaven Nov 12 #10

I see you as rather a brilliant person so this reply surprises me. AZJonnie Nov 12 #11

I believe my last post failed to communicate to you what I intended. RockRaven Nov 12 #18

Thanks for clarification. This is exactly the sort of cogent argument I always see from RockRaven AZJonnie Nov 13 #33

I don't think BeerBarrelPolka Nov 13 #34

yeah OK Skittles Nov 12 #12

Because Biden wanted to protect others. Sadly. Bluesaph Nov 13 #32

I am one KentuckyWoman Nov 12 #19

The White House released the name Abnredleg Nov 12 #2

Well, that's very convenient since Giuffre REPEATEDLY exonerated Trump of any wrongdoing including in her book AZJonnie Nov 12 #7

do you admit that Trump is one vile, disgusting POS??? Skittles Nov 12 #13

Do you not see what I post, all day and every day? I mean obviously not everything, but generally? AZJonnie Nov 12 #15

The premise of this post is wrong, from what I've read. The ID is known, from multiple RockRaven Nov 12 #5

See my post #7 above this one. AZJonnie Nov 12 #9

and how do you know she wasn't under duress? Skittles Nov 12 #14

Because it was in her 2025 memoir that she just wrote, and her estate released posthumously AZJonnie Nov 12 #17

speak for yourself Skittles Nov 12 #21

We are making the same point. Yes, she is gone, having exonerated him (to her knowledge) on her way out. AZJonnie Nov 12 #23

It doesn't matter Boo1 Nov 12 #16

I want to address this part of your post Quiet Em Nov 12 #20

I get what you mean, but I was asked why *I* am so interested in the case near the top of the thread. AZJonnie Nov 12 #24

You are not annoying me and no apology is required. Disaffected Nov 12 #22

From what I've read, the "VICTIM" redaction was in the version of the files supplied by the estate, Emrys Nov 12 #25

Not suggesting anyone tried to warp the facts, but mistakes can be made on a task like that AZJonnie Nov 12 #26

It MIGHT be an inside joke, but to borrow the words of a past US president, "I want to hear him deny it." Emrys Nov 12 #28

I've said this like 20 times in various posts over months but not everyone see everything, so again lol AZJonnie Nov 13 #29

"the 'complete release of DoJ files' for any case is not a normal occurrence" Emrys Nov 13 #30

Setting aside the details of our particular definitions of "great lengths", the point is we agree AZJonnie Nov 13 #31

AZJohnny I agree with you that it wasn't Virginia Roberts Giuffre that Chump met at Epstein's house FakeNoose Nov 12 #27