Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sorry to annoy everyone yet again, but much about that Epstein email hangs on the accuracy of one word [View all]AZJonnie
(2,385 posts)15. Do you not see what I post, all day and every day? I mean obviously not everything, but generally?
I blast that motherfucker, and the GQP, all day, every day. Of COURSE I think he's vile disgusting POS. I'm POSITIVE that Trump absolutely knew what Epstein was doing, and didn't do shit. In fact, as I've often said, I think the vile POS tried to blackmail Epstein, and that is what the birthday card actually was, because Epstein knew Trump was laundering Russian money through his FL properties, and Trump knew what Epstein was up to. So the message was "you keep my secrets, I'll keep yours". Which is extremely vile. I'm just a lot LESS sure he was banging Epstein's victims, part of his "ring", etc. The evidence remains weak. I'm sorry, I call it as I see it
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sorry to annoy everyone yet again, but much about that Epstein email hangs on the accuracy of one word [View all]
AZJonnie
Nov 12
OP
I cannot possibly imagine that the DoJ does/did not have everything the Estate has in this regard, long ago
AZJonnie
Nov 12
#8
Well, not just Biden's DOJ. Sorry to burst the bubble you'd prefer to exist in, but it is true.
RockRaven
Nov 12
#10
Thanks for clarification. This is exactly the sort of cogent argument I always see from RockRaven
AZJonnie
Nov 13
#33
Well, that's very convenient since Giuffre REPEATEDLY exonerated Trump of any wrongdoing including in her book
AZJonnie
Nov 12
#7
Do you not see what I post, all day and every day? I mean obviously not everything, but generally?
AZJonnie
Nov 12
#15
The premise of this post is wrong, from what I've read. The ID is known, from multiple
RockRaven
Nov 12
#5
Because it was in her 2025 memoir that she just wrote, and her estate released posthumously
AZJonnie
Nov 12
#17
We are making the same point. Yes, she is gone, having exonerated him (to her knowledge) on her way out.
AZJonnie
Nov 12
#23
I get what you mean, but I was asked why *I* am so interested in the case near the top of the thread.
AZJonnie
Nov 12
#24
From what I've read, the "VICTIM" redaction was in the version of the files supplied by the estate,
Emrys
Nov 12
#25
Not suggesting anyone tried to warp the facts, but mistakes can be made on a task like that
AZJonnie
Nov 12
#26
It MIGHT be an inside joke, but to borrow the words of a past US president, "I want to hear him deny it."
Emrys
Nov 12
#28
I've said this like 20 times in various posts over months but not everyone see everything, so again lol
AZJonnie
Nov 13
#29