Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Boebert and Mace claim that they will not be removing their names from the discharge petition. [View all]slightlv
(7,085 posts)31. I don't quite know what to make of the section
in Permitted Withholdings...
(B) depict or contain child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) as defined under 18 U.S.C. 2256 and prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 22522252A;
So, because it would be obscenity under the U.S. laws, they're permitted to withhold the materials? Isn't the point of this to root out the corruption and obscenity, obtain justice for those so used, and (wishfully) adjudicate, judge, and march to prison those, like trump, who took part in these horrible crimes?
I don't know what material is available in these situations... but I kind of see this akin to refusing to show the horror of mass school shootings. If people could see the aftermath, we might actually get legal changes. While it's all just words and thoughts in the mind, we sit in a shooting gallery.
I just don't want to see what these people (girls, young women, and boys) be hidden behind legalities like gun crimes. It seems we "forgive" the worst of the worst, while locking up law-abiding citizens who may have missed a court date, etc...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Boebert and Mace claim that they will not be removing their names from the discharge petition. [View all]
demmiblue
Nov 12
OP
Its probably because they realize that there is likely no way the files will be released anyway. n/t
demmiblue
Nov 12
#6
OK. This explains why those files got released today. They came from the Epstein estate, NOT the DOJ
Wiz Imp
Nov 12
#42
West Wing ketchup bottles are considering throwing themselves against a wall to beat the rush.
11 Bravo
Nov 12
#10
They know that the orange turd is becoming weaker and is losing support among magaloons also
kimbutgar
Nov 12
#13
Trump tells Mikey to expel Mace, MTG or Boebert for mental instability and moral turpitude.
Marcuse
Nov 12
#19
They can't after it reaches 218 votes, which it just did, according to MeidasTouch.
highplainsdem
Nov 12
#24
I predict Mikey will announce the vote for the 2nd Tues. of the 13th month. nt
MarineCombatEngineer
Nov 12
#27
As noted, once 218 signatures are achieved, the list is "frozen." But the vote isn't immediate. Here the process:
onenote
Nov 12
#35
According to Politico, the vote is expected to take pllace the first week of December
Wiz Imp
Nov 12
#43