Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

slightlv

(7,085 posts)
31. I don't quite know what to make of the section
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 05:48 PM
Nov 12

in Permitted Withholdings...

(B) depict or contain child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) as defined under 18 U.S.C. 2256 and prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 2252–2252A;


So, because it would be obscenity under the U.S. laws, they're permitted to withhold the materials? Isn't the point of this to root out the corruption and obscenity, obtain justice for those so used, and (wishfully) adjudicate, judge, and march to prison those, like trump, who took part in these horrible crimes?

I don't know what material is available in these situations... but I kind of see this akin to refusing to show the horror of mass school shootings. If people could see the aftermath, we might actually get legal changes. While it's all just words and thoughts in the mind, we sit in a shooting gallery.

I just don't want to see what these people (girls, young women, and boys) be hidden behind legalities like gun crimes. It seems we "forgive" the worst of the worst, while locking up law-abiding citizens who may have missed a court date, etc...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R UTUSN Nov 12 #1
Are they negotiating for a bigger bribe? Irish_Dem Nov 12 #2
Its probably because they realize that there is likely no way the files will be released anyway. n/t demmiblue Nov 12 #6
Or the files have all been re-written to make Trump look like Mother Theresa. Irish_Dem Nov 12 #8
I would love to see an AI picture of that... ananda Nov 12 #32
Or how about this? PJMcK Nov 12 #11
Additionally, Mace has built her entire public persona Bettie Nov 12 #12
I keep posting this reminder GusBob Nov 12 #14
Yes, they're horrible people uponit7771 Nov 12 #20
Good Lord. Principles? Now? nolabear Nov 12 #3
More to do with the prospect of Boebert losing her house seat. BannonsLiver Nov 12 #45
Thanks, blue! Leghorn21 Nov 12 #4
25 Minutes BeerBarrelPolka Nov 12 #5
As long as Mr trump keeps throwing fits over this and keeps it in the news Torchlight Nov 12 #7
Well, you were wrong, MarineCombatEngineer Nov 12 #23
I would imagine that Massie is testing a few other Republicans to sign on karynnj Nov 12 #9
There are reports that as many as 100 Republicans (or more!) could vote YES Wiz Imp Nov 12 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta Nov 12 #18
Nope. It IS legislation. Wiz Imp Nov 12 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta Nov 12 #37
You're wrong. I don't know why you insist on arguing this. Wiz Imp Nov 12 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta Nov 12 #38
There is no indication that the House will do a full investigation of this. Wiz Imp Nov 12 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta Nov 12 #41
OK. This explains why those files got released today. They came from the Epstein estate, NOT the DOJ Wiz Imp Nov 12 #42
West Wing ketchup bottles are considering throwing themselves against a wall to beat the rush. 11 Bravo Nov 12 #10
They know that the orange turd is becoming weaker and is losing support among magaloons also kimbutgar Nov 12 #13
Rat's abandoning a sinking ship... sop Nov 12 #16
I like this one from Family Guy also: MarineCombatEngineer Nov 12 #21
Can't believe I'm saying this, but GOOD ON Lauren Boebert and Nancy Mace! Fil1957 Nov 12 #17
Trump tells Mikey to expel Mace, MTG or Boebert for mental instability and moral turpitude. Marcuse Nov 12 #19
They can't after it reaches 218 votes, which it just did, according to MeidasTouch. highplainsdem Nov 12 #24
Soooooo. .tomorrow? niyad Nov 12 #25
LOL. MarineCombatEngineer Nov 12 #26
I predict Mikey will announce the vote for the 2nd Tues. of the 13th month. nt MarineCombatEngineer Nov 12 #27
They will eventually cave angrychair Nov 12 #28
It could also be that they are a whole lot younger than the orange turdblossom... llmart Nov 12 #29
Crum has outlived his usefullness to them bucolic_frolic Nov 12 #30
I don't quite know what to make of the section slightlv Nov 12 #31
Today. Scrivener7 Nov 12 #33
du rec. AllaN01Bear Nov 12 #34
As noted, once 218 signatures are achieved, the list is "frozen." But the vote isn't immediate. Here the process: onenote Nov 12 #35
According to Politico, the vote is expected to take pllace the first week of December Wiz Imp Nov 12 #43
Sounds right, but now its being reported that Johnson wants to accelerate the process. onenote Nov 12 #44
We only wish that someone popsdenver Nov 12 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Boebert and Mace claim th...»Reply #31