Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So as I wake this morning and what no vote, no food stamps... [View all]onenote
(45,882 posts)86. Can I take you up on your bet about Trump keeping the SNAP crisis and not paying?
A more serious question: At what point do you think the repubs would have caved and agreed to an extension of the ACA enhanced subsidies? A week? Two weeks? A month? Two months? And do you think that if they caved they would agree to a permanent extension? A one year extension? An extension with new restrictions?
In a perfect world, the republicans would agree to a CR that extended the expiring enhanced subsidies, funded SNAP for the full fiscal year, rehired fired federal employees and guaranteed that they and the furloughed employees and those that worked without pay would get their back pay.
Convince me there was a route to that perfect outcome and a timeline for achieving it. Convince me the repubs would suddenly give a shit about the harm they were causing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Indivisible primary campaign to replace cowardice with backbone. With excerpt below.
usonian
Nov 12
#15
So, women will be expected to pay the "price" for continued ACA subsidies for all?
Diamond_Dog
Nov 12
#26
Can I take you up on your bet about Trump keeping the SNAP crisis and not paying?
onenote
Nov 12
#86
10 more days and the Airlines would have stormed the GOP caucus leaders on the Hill
Attilatheblond
Nov 12
#40
Thats exactly the reason. Thune (and some House republicans) would have taken the ACA funding AS A MERCY.
Volaris
Nov 12
#93
Yeah, I'm no politician but I would think that would be engraved in stone somewhere.
Autumn
Nov 12
#27
It will vary by state -- the money will be available, but because of the partial payments, it may take as much as a week
onenote
Nov 13
#110
Whatever Schumer is/is not doing behind the scenes, his communication failures compel removal
Arazi
Nov 12
#57
Well excuse the hell out of me But please split hairs. Again. What do you think Tillis, Schumer and his masterful
Autumn
Nov 12
#80
That still isn't an excuse for posting misinformation, intentionally or otherwise.
onenote
Nov 12
#89
If its all over social media, and I haven't seen it, its a bunch of know nothings spreading misinformation
onenote
Nov 12
#92
Because the Democrats shouldn't have started it if they weren't going to finish it.
hamsterjill
Nov 12
#95
So you see no benefit from forcing the repubs to oppose extension of the ACA enhanced benefits.
onenote
Nov 12
#97
Yesterday Rick Wilson said from his experience he knew that Democrats are gullible. Ya think?
flashman13
Nov 12
#43