General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Holocaust inversion and secondary or soft antisemitism are nothing new. [View all]AloeVera
(3,455 posts)The intent has been proven. By the results
By the evidence before the world's eyes.
If you are reduced to quibbling about legal definitions - the same definition used by genocide scholars who say it's clearly a genocide - while faced with the apocalypse and HORRIFIC human suffering in Gaza.... then you are someone I cannot dialogue with.
An army/military that has invaded a territory and has control of it, as Israel has/does in Gaza, is called an Occupying Power in international law. It has obligations as I outlined. I was not referring to Gaza's prior status, which btw according to international law and the UN, was still considered occupied after 2005. You can read up on their rationale.
No one is going to rid Israel of Jews. That was never gonna happen by Hamas - how? - and even less now.
But isn't it weird though, that in fact it is Palestinians who are going to suffer that fate instead? From THEIR homeland? What a coincidence and twist of fate! That was never in the cards! Nobody EVER thought of that before! No one had such a plan and no one projected that plan onto the Palestinians!
Right?
Really no need to answer. Please.
Edit history
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):