Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: LA Grand Juries Are Refusing to Indict ICE Protestors [View all]hatrack
(63,596 posts)48. No indictment, so they walk
As noted above, it's a big "Fuck ALL y'all!" to Shitstain's goons.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I am so pleased to read that some grand juries are refusing to indict Ice protestors.
CaliforniaPeggy
Jul 24
#1
Wait, they are trying to deny justice to people who are not Trrumpers. That is a no no no. No.
twodogsbarking
Jul 24
#8
Thanks for reading it. I meant to say "deny" instead of "do". I srewed up. Mea culpa.
twodogsbarking
Jul 24
#21
This is why we need regular people to answer their jury duty summons!
questionseverything
Jul 24
#12
Is it "jury nullification" or a righteous reaction to "trumped up" charges?
Midnight Writer
Jul 24
#27
I don't think this is nullification, that happens if jurors believe the defendant technically broke the law
questionseverything
Jul 24
#34