Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Why didn't BIDEN release the Epstein files!?" Well.... [View all]lees1975
(6,700 posts)8. Garland would never have done it, even if they weren't sealed.
He'd have thrown his hands up at the first filed delay by the other side, thankful that he didn't have to do the work or take the heat.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Which while well intended and in normal times would have been inarguable, turns out it -- in particular,
KPN
Monday
#39
I appreciate that response -- and totally agree with it, though my post didn't make that clear. Just avoiding
KPN
Monday
#44
Areed on Hillary. I was talling about Bill Clinton's name being associated with the Epstein files.
brush
Monday
#21
We also have Merrit Garland/Chuck Schumer, and Joe Biden, who play by the rules.
mackdaddy
Sunday
#4
Because Biden is not a snivelling vindictive excuse for a human being. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Sunday
#12
Someone is out there blaming Garland, I'm sure. He's the convenient scapegoat for everything.
Oopsie Daisy
Monday
#24