Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

RoeVWade

(585 posts)

6. Yes, but

Reply to snot (Reply #5)

Fri Jul 18, 2025, 01:26 PM

Friday

the Dems haven't pursued it out of fear that too many of them might be vulnerable to similar accusations.

(I honestly haven't been able to figure out more plausible explanation for why either the emoluments issue or the Epstein mess haven't been seriously pursued by either side.)

I wouldn't be surprised it there were a number of familiar people showing up in the Epstein files. But I believe (or would like to believe) that that we will be able to distinguish the "yeah you were at a random party with Epstein" versus, people who had repeated encounters with him or hung out with him.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

snot susanr516

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

On Trump's "If Democrats had anything on me, they would have released it" defense. SAME ANSWER TRUMPIE [View all] RoeVWade Friday OP

Yeah, like what good, would it do. He gets away with everything. Doesn't matter if you expose his wrongdoing. Walleye Friday #1

They would have... atreides1 Friday #2

Can't release sealed court documents. BlueTsunami2018 Friday #3

I think the Democrats did release stuff to grand juries and impeachments. sinkingfeeling Friday #4

I fear the case is similar to the "emoluments" issue - snot Friday #5

Yes, but RoeVWade Friday #6

Agreed - I don't believe in guilt by association; but snot Friday #8

That's my assumption thought crime Friday #7