Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ocelot II

(126,103 posts)

6. They could correctly assume that the Democrats are mostly in the big cities,

Reply to Qutzupalotl (Reply #4)

Fri Jul 18, 2025, 11:44 AM

Friday

but they'd need a lot more data to determine who the individual voters are. They could also cross-reference political contributions, which are public information, and some social media. So maybe at least some individual Democratic voters could be identified even if not registered as such. Then what, and what are the plans for those states that do identify voters by party?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BOEBERT former flunky messing with CO county clerks & DOJ requesting voter rolls in 9 states on behalf of WH [View all] UTUSN Friday OP

Minnesota doesn't register voters by party designation, Ocelot II Friday #1

Plus, Dem large constituencies voter-suppress themselves, making Repuke suppression almost superfluous UTUSN Friday #2

Minnesota consistently has among the highest voter turnout numbers in the US, Ocelot II Friday #3

The old FB data from Cambridge Analytica is out there Qutzupalotl Friday #4

They could correctly assume that the Democrats are mostly in the big cities, Ocelot II Friday #6

This is where I speculate, but according to Qutzupalotl Friday #7

As troubling as this is, it indicates fear of the electorate Qutzupalotl Friday #5