Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

no_hypocrisy

(52,818 posts)
3. He doesn't have to go through the charade of seating Bove on a federal appeals court.
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 08:30 PM
Jul 16

Remember Harriet Myers? The attorney (not judge) whom Shrub wanted to put on SCOTUS? She wasn't even a municipal court judge or magistrate. There's nothing in the Constitution or federal law that prevents a President from requesting anybody to be appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Well, not anybody. You have to know SOMETHING about law.

And you remember how Myers' nomination was shot down.

Bove is a legal hack. Even if he were confirmed, he wouldn't have to do jack shit. Ask questions? Nah. Clarence Thomas doesn't ask questions either. Write opinions? Nah. Bove will have his law clerks do that. He'll just make up his mind what the "right answer" should be and tell them to go with whatever brief was submitted and cut and paste.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's Plans to Put Emil...»Reply #3