Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz [View all]AZJonnie
(1,099 posts)31. This may not quite be the bombshell that people imagine it to be
From an account regarding this interview:
Dershowitz asserted that this suppression is wrong and that the public has a right to know all the information related to the case. He emphasized his advocacy for "total transparency" in the release of all Epstein-related documents, without redaction, claiming that he believes all documents would prove his innocence concerning past allegations against him related to the case. When asked if the individuals being protected were politicians or business leaders, Dershowitz replied that they were "everything". He further explained that some individuals were accused, while others were accusers, and judges had ruled against releasing information about those who claimed to be victims. Dershowitz argued that some of these individuals might not be victims but perpetrators, and that information about false accusers, who he claimed have accused innocent people for money, is also being deliberately suppressed. He argued that if an accusation is made public, material diminishing the accuser's credibility should also be released "
What he's likely referring to are his grievances re: Giuffre's accusations (which she recanted in 2022), and the fact that it was made difficult for him to defend himself against her claims because so much is/was under seal. He's also probably talking about her lawyer David Boies, who he accused at the time of the defamation cases (2019 iirc) of being the architect (more or less) of Giuffre's claims about the 'pedophile prostitution ring' when he took on her case and together they tried to sue some Victoria's Secret guy for hundreds of millions, and she made her claims about Dersh.
The conspiracy, if you will, that's under wraps is one in his own mind, wherein Giuffre and her attorney Boies concocted these "Epstein the Pimp" stories late in the game, and went after rich people associated with Epstein for money. Mark my words, there will always be SOME reason he can't personally spill the beans about some 'client list', whether there is one or not, whether he knows who's on it or not.
He thinks that if the 'truth were all out', the conclusion by everyone would be that Giuffre and Boies are liars and extortionists, and he is a choir boy. Not kidding. This is not new stuff coming from him, it's only the timing that is interesting.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

The Biden DoJ, headed by Garland, threw everything they had at Maxwell in the federal case
AZJonnie
Jul 13
#3
She was convicted of trafficking one girl to Epstein, and molesting a bunch of others.
AZJonnie
Jul 14
#6
Nope. She'll either threaten to talk and get out, or be killed in jail or when she's out'.
brush
Jul 14
#9
I am not saying anyone else is saying that Biden's DoJ failed, or was part of a conspiracy
AZJonnie
Jul 14
#10
Bottom-line, the evidence that there was a vast and far reaching conspiracy involving dozes of girls being trafficked
AZJonnie
Jul 14
#13
Perhaps you could provide an article backing your claim that LEO's mentioned people other than
AZJonnie
Jul 14
#27
Exactly. Everyone assumes Epstein was sharing his perversions with his friends
Buckeyeblue
Jul 14
#19
I wrote plenty more in this thread if you care to glean my point, it's well spelled out, and no that's not it
AZJonnie
Jul 14
#32