Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

stillcool

(34,039 posts)

2. I guess that is how change works

Reply to gab13by13 (Reply #1)

Mon Apr 28, 2025, 09:42 AM

Apr 28

necessity being the mother of invention, a political party can no longer be individuals elected to public office by the people of their state. The job description needs to include, going to other states, being a public speaker, being able to draw crowds of people, and appear as often as possible on television. Legislating and serving states in the federal government is done. Perhaps it might be better to do away completely with the apparatus that is our federal government?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

betsuni

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Some People are Disallustioned with Party Leadership [View all] Chasstev365 Apr 28 OP

My problem with leadership is this: gab13by13 Apr 28 #1

I guess that is how change works stillcool Apr 28 #2

Individuals elected to public office by the people of their state is so, like, status quo. betsuni Apr 28 #3

Actors. Actresses as trophy wives stillcool Apr 28 #4

Congress is doing this for a reason. Writing letters. chowder66 Apr 28 #5