Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Arazi

(7,737 posts)
40. How about joining the Jeffries/Booker sit in today?
Sun Apr 27, 2025, 02:22 PM
Yesterday

Or holding a press conference with the Harvard attorneys who are pushing back.

Or participate in organizing a united national level university resistance movement, connecting the organizations together.

I put about 3 seconds of effort into brainstorming a few direct actions he could take instead of a “strong letter” (and come on, even you can’t think this is at all an effective leadership action)

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, that oughtta do it. Ocelot II Yesterday #1
As Rachel says, Don't listen to what people say; watch what they do...What has he done to fix the problem?nt mitch96 Yesterday #24
What would you anticipate a Senate minority leader would do that's within their legal powers to "fix the problem"? meadowlander Yesterday #44
Booker and Jeffries gave a damned fine workshop today on the Capitol Steps, getting people engaged and resisting Attilatheblond Yesterday #55
We're being played Ponietz Yesterday #36
OOOOOOOOH, a strong letter. That'll show him. Vinca Yesterday #2
A very strong letter. republianmushroom Yesterday #54
Completely feckless. choie Yesterday #3
We need new leaders. yardwork Yesterday #4
just laughable et tu Yesterday #5
Good thing the letter was written very strongly dalton99a Yesterday #6
She should have interviewed Chris Murphy instead of Schumer. CrispyQ Yesterday #7
Please retire. Passages Yesterday #8
I hope is was also "sternly worded" BoRaGard Yesterday #9
Schumer fights incrementally -- the next one in August will be stern Ponietz Yesterday #37
I don't believe he has interest in the political destruction of Trump. David__77 Yesterday #10
I think you're right. yardwork Yesterday #17
i don't know if it's in the 1970s but it's glaringly obvious they sure as hell are stuck. nt orleans 23 hrs ago #60
How about telling him that not one nominee is going through and moniss Yesterday #11
Schumer personally blocked two nominees on April 16. lapucelle Yesterday #52
Then what? Kid Berwyn Yesterday #12
I'm sure shaking a finger will be next, followed by stomping his feet. Chemical Bill Yesterday #50
That's telling him, now if Susan will tell Trump she is also concerned that would doc03 Yesterday #13
Right. yardwork Yesterday #15
And Schumer's said to be, "The smartest guy in the room". jalan48 Yesterday #14
Pathetic Ponietz Yesterday #16
A warrant for the arrest of the idiot would be a helluva lot more appropriate. Ping Tung Yesterday #18
I'm thinking Schumers next step, would have to be a meeting with Senate Majority Ars Longa Yesterday #19
He really did say that? How did Schumer get so old and foggy? Baitball Blogger Yesterday #20
"We sent a letter to someone who can't/won't read." Nice. n/t flvegan Yesterday #21
sigh Celerity Yesterday #22
It seems Pelosi had the testicles,... magicarpet Yesterday #23
I can't say what I'm thinking rn because it might get me banned. harumph Yesterday #25
Jesus Fucking Christ LuvLoogie Yesterday #26
This was my planned message. You beat me to it. hatrack Yesterday #43
Words! Not action! C_U_L8R Yesterday #27
Schumer is there for a reason WSHazel Yesterday #28
Go piss up a rope, Schumer. Paladin Yesterday #29
BFD Faux pas Yesterday #30
Omg, I called it here: Sky Jewels Yesterday #31
Replace him, Senators. Like a month ago. Jesus H. It's like he's making fun of us now. Scrivener7 Yesterday #32
Well, there you have it. taxi Yesterday #33
And we're excoriating David Hogg for saying these guys need to be primaried Arazi Yesterday #34
I'm not a huge Schumer fan, but... LudwigPastorius Yesterday #35
How about joining the Jeffries/Booker sit in today? Arazi Yesterday #40
Re: a press conference LudwigPastorius Yesterday #42
You asked for specific examples Arazi Yesterday #56
# circled was just the people watching AT THE TIME. It varied a lot and didn't count the cumilative # of people who saw Attilatheblond Yesterday #58
Here. Lots of specific suggestions. Scrivener7 Yesterday #45
No! Not a Strong Letter!! tavernier Yesterday #38
(thanks for the chuckle or smirk or whatever my reaction was reading this) nt orleans 23 hrs ago #61
Oh, my! A strongly-worded letter! Trump will be shaking in his little bunny slippers. Martin68 Yesterday #39
Oh no! Greg_In_SF Yesterday #41
Fix the problem??????? bdamomma Yesterday #46
This is not leadership, its colossal self-importance Ruby the Liberal Yesterday #47
This. His condescendingly patting us on the head like this, while being our very own Chamberlain, is maddening. Scrivener7 Yesterday #49
The pompous Dolores umbrages that have been defending every impotent action Schumer has taken are much worse SunImp Yesterday #59
Not a huge Bash fan senseandsensibility Yesterday #48
What a moron. Even Dana "I need some carbs" Bash is stunned. Not that it takes much to stun her, but really, Chuck. mucholderthandirt Yesterday #51
I sounded the alarm when the shitler was winning the republican nomination..... Bread and Circuses Yesterday #53
I assumed this HAD to be The Onion... regnaD kciN Yesterday #57
Time for him to resign. This is not leadership... SSJVegeta 22 hrs ago #62
A very strong letter just the other day asking very strong questions fujiyamasan 21 hrs ago #63
Does Schumer really think a letter would stop Dump? sakabatou 20 hrs ago #64
It will be a minor note in the history of all this but the utter inability of Schumer to understand what's happening ... mahatmakanejeeves 20 hrs ago #65
No! No! Anything but THAT! Buns_of_Fire 19 hrs ago #66
To be fair SocialDemocrat61 15 hrs ago #67
I have no problem with sending that letter... Tom Rinaldo 14 hrs ago #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sen Schumer on response t...»Reply #40