Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Liberal YouTubers
Related: About this forumSandwich-thrower case tossed by grand jury: Live with Andrew Weissmann - All Rise News
Drawing from decades of experience within the Justice Department, Andrew Weissmann unpacks just what it means when a grand jury says "no true bill." - 08/27/2025.
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Sandwich-thrower case tossed by grand jury: Live with Andrew Weissmann - All Rise News (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
Yesterday
OP
Some said this reflected 'jury nullification.' It WASN'T, it was proper decision of grand jury.
elleng
Yesterday
#1
They would have returned a different verdict if the thrower had used a sandwich
Wonder Why
17 hrs ago
#5
elleng
(140,517 posts)1. Some said this reflected 'jury nullification.' It WASN'T, it was proper decision of grand jury.
Rhiannon12866
(241,527 posts)2. Thanks for the clarification


elleng
(140,517 posts)4. You're welcome.
Just one of many errors (we lawyers may note, and confuse electorate.)
MrWowWow
(907 posts)3. Have you ever heard of a wish sandwich?
A wish sandwich is the kind of a sandwich where you have two slices of bread and you
Hmm, hmm, hmm
Wish you had some meat!
Bow bow bow!
[
Wonder Why
(6,104 posts)5. They would have returned a different verdict if the thrower had used a sandwich
from a real local deli because then it would have been an attack on the ICEist. But because it was a Subway, which is just as good for throwing as it is for eating, it constituted free speech.