Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Liberal YouTubers
Related: About this forumTrump CELEBRATES Too Early as APPEALS BACKFIRE - Legal AF
Confused by the Supreme Court's recent ruling allowing Trump to destroy our public health and a NY court's ruling finding Trump a fraudster, but striking the fraud repayment amount? You won't be after Ben Meiselas and Michael Popok are done with the topic on the top rated Legal AF podcast. - 08/27/2025.
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Trump CELEBRATES Too Early as APPEALS BACKFIRE - Legal AF (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
17 hrs ago
OP
Deadline: Legal Blog--Why Trump is appealing the New York civil fraud ruling after claiming 'TOTAL VICTORY'
LetMyPeopleVote
7 hrs ago
#1
LetMyPeopleVote
(168,691 posts)1. Deadline: Legal Blog--Why Trump is appealing the New York civil fraud ruling after claiming 'TOTAL VICTORY'
The president won a significant victory but not a complete one. That's why he's seeking further relief from New Yorks highest state court.
Why Trump is appealing the New York civil fraud ruling after claiming âTOTAL VICTORYâ
— (@ny-news.bsky.social) 2025-08-27T17:42:03+00:00
https://www.europesays.com/us/180237/
When New Yorkâs mid-level appeals court threw out the nearly half-billion-dollar penalty against Donald â¦#ny #nyc #newyork #nynews #nycnews #newyorknews #us #news #usnews
When New Yorks mid-level appeals court threw out the nearly half-billion-dollar penalty against Donald Trump last week, New York Attorney General Letitia James quickly vowed to appeal. But now, the president is seeking to appeal the civil fraud ruling despite having claimed TOTAL VICTORY last week.
That Trump is appealing might seem curious at first glance, especially if one was the under the impression that the ruling was, as the president claimed, a complete win for him. But as I explained when the ruling came out, it was a messy one that made both James and Trumps celebrations awkward......
In it, she embraced the Appellate Divisions ruling for affirming that Trump, his company and his sons Eric and Don Jr. are liable for fraud, and for upholding limits on the Trumps ability to do business in the state. Though James didnt directly mention the massive money loss, her statement ended by saying her office will seek appeal to the Court of Appeals and continue to protect the rights and interests of New Yorkers.....
As James touted, there are aspects of the ruling that Trump and his civil co-defendants did lose. Their notice of appeal, filed Tuesday, makes clear that thats what theyre challenging: the Appellate Divisions order to the extent that it affirms in part James trial-court win.
Appellate Division justices themselves acknowledged the possibility that their jumble of opinions wouldnt be the last word. Their three separate decisions each had different rationales, none of them garnering a true majority on the five-justice panel. Two of the justices wrote that they only reluctantly joined two others for the purposes of technically rendering a decision, to allow the option of further review of this matter by the Court of Appeals.
So it wont be surprising if the Court of Appeals endeavors to issue a clearer decision in the matter, which carries implications for business dealings throughout the state, not limited to this Trump case. Whatever that high court does, both sides have reason to fight for a different outcome than the one thats currently on the table.
That Trump is appealing might seem curious at first glance, especially if one was the under the impression that the ruling was, as the president claimed, a complete win for him. But as I explained when the ruling came out, it was a messy one that made both James and Trumps celebrations awkward......
In it, she embraced the Appellate Divisions ruling for affirming that Trump, his company and his sons Eric and Don Jr. are liable for fraud, and for upholding limits on the Trumps ability to do business in the state. Though James didnt directly mention the massive money loss, her statement ended by saying her office will seek appeal to the Court of Appeals and continue to protect the rights and interests of New Yorkers.....
As James touted, there are aspects of the ruling that Trump and his civil co-defendants did lose. Their notice of appeal, filed Tuesday, makes clear that thats what theyre challenging: the Appellate Divisions order to the extent that it affirms in part James trial-court win.
Appellate Division justices themselves acknowledged the possibility that their jumble of opinions wouldnt be the last word. Their three separate decisions each had different rationales, none of them garnering a true majority on the five-justice panel. Two of the justices wrote that they only reluctantly joined two others for the purposes of technically rendering a decision, to allow the option of further review of this matter by the Court of Appeals.
So it wont be surprising if the Court of Appeals endeavors to issue a clearer decision in the matter, which carries implications for business dealings throughout the state, not limited to this Trump case. Whatever that high court does, both sides have reason to fight for a different outcome than the one thats currently on the table.