Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(120,335 posts)
Sun Apr 27, 2025, 12:31 AM Yesterday

Judge Threatens Mike Lindell's Lawyers After Catching Them Using AI To Write Legal Filings - Farron Balanced



MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell's legal team got absolutely destroyed by a federal judge this week after she read a legal filing from the team. It was determined that they used Artificial Intelligence (AI) to write their filing, which contained almost 30 citations of legal cases that didn't actually exist. If this is the stellar team of legal scholars that Lindell is going to use in his defamation cases then he may as well start writing checks. Farron Cousins explains what happened.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Threatens Mike Lindell's Lawyers After Catching Them Using AI To Write Legal Filings - Farron Balanced (Original Post) TexasTowelie Yesterday OP
I find this fraudulent gesture to be egregious and insulting. no_hypocrisy Yesterday #1

no_hypocrisy

(51,308 posts)
1. I find this fraudulent gesture to be egregious and insulting.
Sun Apr 27, 2025, 04:18 AM
Yesterday

I have spent hours and hours, researching case law, statutes, and recent holdings when I draft a brief. I use The Blue Book to ensure the accuracy of the citations.

Because I don't want my dedication of the hours I spent preparing my brief to be for naught when a judge's law clerk throws it back at me for inaccuracy (or worse, my adversary and/or the judge).

To use AI as a "shortcut" is likely OK only if you do the further work to ensure its validity.

When I went undergraduate, you could be asked to leave the college if you omitted footnotes and references.

Just reminding everyone that a false reference to law that isn't caught can become binding law if it isn't caught. The whole idea of stare decisis and precedent is based on development of existing law, not fictional law.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Liberal YouTubers»Judge Threatens Mike Lind...